Literature DB >> 23088247

Perimetry in children: survey of current practices in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Bronwen C Walters1, Jugnoo S Rahi, Phillippa M Cumberland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visual fields are key functional outcome measures in children with a variety of ophthalmologic disorders. However, reliably assessing fields in children is challenging. We report the findings of a survey of current practices of perimetry in children in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to Orthoptic Service Heads in July 2008. Respondents were asked for comments regarding visual field testing in children as well as details of the volume and type of perimetry performed in their units, over a 1-year period.
RESULTS: Of the 98 (62%) completed questionnaires, 16 departments reported not testing visual fields in children. In total 3675 subjects under 16 years of age were reported to have undergone perimetry in 1 year, most in units with a ≥ 50% pediatric caseload for orthoptics. A total of 42% of units used static perimetry alone, 11% kinetic, and 47% used a combination of both.
CONCLUSION: High numbers of visual field tests are carried out in children in the UK and Ireland annually. Automated perimetry is used predominantly, despite the underlying algorithms having been developed for adult populations. Thus there is a clear need for more research, to ensure that evolving management practices are informed by understanding of the diagnostic accuracy and value of perimetry in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088247     DOI: 10.3109/09286586.2012.718027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; John Brookes; Maria Papadopoulos; Peng Tee Khaw; Ananth C Viswanathan; David Garway-Heath; Mario Cortina-Borja; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Marco A Miranda; David B Henson; Cecilia Fenerty; Susmito Biswas; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Normal Threshold Size of Stimuli in Children Using a Game-Based Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Zaria Ali; Siddharth Subramani; Susmito Biswas; Cecilia Fenerty; David B Henson; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-11-24

4.  Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Conrad Schmoll; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Alastair G Wilkinson; Alan O Mulvihill; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Feasibility, Accuracy, and Repeatability of Suprathreshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Lorraine A Cameron; Alice D McTrusty; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.