Literature DB >> 2308758

Self-administration of morphine in bone marrow transplant patients reduces drug requirement.

Harlan F Hill1, Richard C Chapman, Judy A Kornell, Keith M Sullivan, Louis C Saeger, Costantino Benedetti.   

Abstract

Bone marrow transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive morphine by either continuous infusion (32 patients) or self-administration of small boluses (patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), 26 patients) for control of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis pain. All patients received morphine for a minimum of 9 days and most required morphine for at least 14 days. Patients rated their pain and side-effect intensity daily using visual analogue scales. Patient pain ratings did not differ between the groups although PCA patients used only 53% as much morphine as the continuous infusion group. Tolerance did not develop in the PCA group; in patients receiving continuous infusion morphine dosage continued to increase throughout the study while pain scores remained constant, indicating that tolerance had developed. Nausea, alertness and respiratory rate measurements did not differ between groups. PCA appeared more effective than the hospital staff determined treatment at delivering the least amount of morphine required to produce maximal pain relief. Patients self-administering morphine did not appear to restrict morphine intake in order to minimize opioid side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2308758     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90062-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  13 in total

1.  A computer-based system for controlling plasma opioid concentration according to patient need for analgesia.

Authors:  H F Hill; R C Jacobson; B A Coda; A M Mackie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  HS014, a selective melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor antagonist, modulates the behavioral effects of morphine in mice.

Authors:  N Eser Ercil; Ruggero Galici; Robert A Kesterson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effect of frequent phone contacts and Optional Food Provision on maintenance of weight loss.

Authors:  R R Wing; R W Jeffery; W L Hellerstedt; L R Burton
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-09

Review 4.  Palliative medicine.

Authors:  R J George; A L Jennings
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Oral morphine for cancer pain.

Authors:  Philip J Wiffen; Bee Wee; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 6.  Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Jan E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Susan Furness; Martin McCabe; Tasneem Khalid; Stefan Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 7.  Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Deborah P Saunders; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Justin Allemano; Paolo Bossi; Marianne D van de Wetering; Nikhil G Rao; Carin Potting; Karis K Cheng; Annette Freidank; Michael T Brennan; Joanne Bowen; Kristopher Dennis; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  [Circadian rhythm of PCA-based opioid consumption in children with chemotherapy-related mucositis].

Authors:  C Schiessl; I Schestag; N Griessinger; R Sittl; B Zernikow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 9.  Patient-controlled analgesia. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  H F Hill; L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.