AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes results from a chronic autoimmune process continuing for years after presentation. We tested whether treatment with teplizumab (a Fc receptor non-binding anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody), after the new-onset period, affects the decline in C-peptide production in individuals with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a randomised placebo-controlled trial we treated 58 participants with type 1 diabetes for 4-12 months withteplizumab or placeboat four academic centres in the USA. A central randomisation centre used computer generated tables to allocate treatments. Investigators, patients, and caregivers were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was a comparison of C-peptide responses to a mixed meal after 1 year. We explored modification of treatment effects in subgroups of patients. RESULTS:Thirty-four and 29 subjects were randomized to the drug and placebo treated groups, respectively. Thirty-one and 27, respectively, were analysed. Although the primary outcome analysis showed a 21.7% higher C-peptide response in the teplizumab-treated group (0.45 vs 0.371; difference, 0.059 [95% CI 0.006, 0.115] nmol/l) (p = 0.03), when corrected for baseline imbalances in HbA(1c) levels, the C-peptide levels in the teplizumab-treated group were 17.7% higher (0.44 vs 0.378; difference, 0.049 [95% CI 0, 0.108] nmol/l, p = 0.09). A greater proportion of placebo-treated participants lost detectable C-peptide responses at 12 months (p = 0.03). The teplizumab group required less exogenous insulin (p < 0.001) but treatment differences in HbA(1c) levels were not observed. Teplizumab was well tolerated. A subgroup analysis showed that treatment benefits were larger in younger individuals and those with HbA(1c) <6.5% at entry. Clinical responders to teplizumab had an increase in circulating CD8 central memory cells 2 months after enrolment compared with non-responders. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: This study suggests that deterioration in insulin secretion may be affected by immune therapy with teplizumab after the new-onset period but the magnitude of the effect is less than during the new-onset period. Our studies identify characteristics of patients most likely to respond to this immune therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378508 FUNDING: This work was supported by grants 2007-502, 2007-1059 and 2006-351 from the JDRF and grants R01 DK057846, P30 DK20495, UL1 RR024139, UL1RR025780, UL1 RR024131 and UL1 RR024134 from the NIH.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes results from a chronic autoimmune process continuing for years after presentation. We tested whether treatment with teplizumab (a Fc receptor non-binding anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody), after the new-onset period, affects the decline in C-peptide production in individuals with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a randomised placebo-controlled trial we treated 58 participants with type 1 diabetes for 4-12 months with teplizumab or placebo at four academic centres in the USA. A central randomisation centre used computer generated tables to allocate treatments. Investigators, patients, and caregivers were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was a comparison of C-peptide responses to a mixed meal after 1 year. We explored modification of treatment effects in subgroups of patients. RESULTS: Thirty-four and 29 subjects were randomized to the drug and placebo treated groups, respectively. Thirty-one and 27, respectively, were analysed. Although the primary outcome analysis showed a 21.7% higher C-peptide response in the teplizumab-treated group (0.45 vs 0.371; difference, 0.059 [95% CI 0.006, 0.115] nmol/l) (p = 0.03), when corrected for baseline imbalances in HbA(1c) levels, the C-peptide levels in the teplizumab-treated group were 17.7% higher (0.44 vs 0.378; difference, 0.049 [95% CI 0, 0.108] nmol/l, p = 0.09). A greater proportion of placebo-treated participants lost detectable C-peptide responses at 12 months (p = 0.03). The teplizumab group required less exogenous insulin (p < 0.001) but treatment differences in HbA(1c) levels were not observed. Teplizumab was well tolerated. A subgroup analysis showed that treatment benefits were larger in younger individuals and those with HbA(1c) <6.5% at entry. Clinical responders to teplizumab had an increase in circulating CD8 central memory cells 2 months after enrolment compared with non-responders. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: This study suggests that deterioration in insulin secretion may be affected by immune therapy with teplizumab after the new-onset period but the magnitude of the effect is less than during the new-onset period. Our studies identify characteristics of patients most likely to respond to this immune therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378508 FUNDING: This work was supported by grants 2007-502, 2007-1059 and 2006-351 from the JDRF and grants R01 DK057846, P30 DK20495, UL1 RR024139, UL1RR025780, UL1 RR024131 and UL1 RR024134 from the NIH.
Authors: Bart Keymeulen; Evy Vandemeulebroucke; Anette G Ziegler; Chantal Mathieu; Leonard Kaufman; Geoff Hale; Frans Gorus; Michel Goldman; Markus Walter; Sophie Candon; Liliane Schandene; Laurent Crenier; Christophe De Block; Jean-Marie Seigneurin; Pieter De Pauw; Denis Pierard; Ilse Weets; Peppy Rebello; Pru Bird; Eleanor Berrie; Mark Frewin; Herman Waldmann; Jean-François Bach; Daniel Pipeleers; Lucienne Chatenoud Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark D Pescovitz; Carla J Greenbaum; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Dorothy J Becker; Stephen E Gitelman; Robin Goland; Peter A Gottlieb; Jennifer B Marks; Paula F McGee; Antoinette M Moran; Philip Raskin; Henry Rodriguez; Desmond A Schatz; Diane Wherrett; Darrell M Wilson; John M Lachin; Jay S Skyler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Johnny Ludvigsson; Maria Faresjö; Maria Hjorth; Stina Axelsson; Mikael Chéramy; Mikael Pihl; Outi Vaarala; Gun Forsander; Sten Ivarsson; Calle Johansson; Agne Lindh; Nils-Osten Nilsson; Jan Aman; Eva Ortqvist; Peter Zerhouni; Rosaura Casas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carla J Greenbaum; Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen; Paula Friedenberg McGee; Tadej Battelino; Burkhard Haastert; Johnny Ludvigsson; Paolo Pozzilli; John M Lachin; Hubert Kolb Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kevan C Herold; Stephen E Gitelman; Umesh Masharani; William Hagopian; Brygida Bisikirska; David Donaldson; Kristina Rother; Beverly Diamond; David M Harlan; Jeffrey A Bluestone Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Ana Luisa Perdigoto; Paula Preston-Hurlburt; Pamela Clark; S Alice Long; Peter S Linsley; Kristina M Harris; Steven E Gitelman; Carla J Greenbaum; Peter A Gottlieb; William Hagopian; Alyssa Woodwyk; James Dziura; Kevan C Herold Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Kevan C Herold; Samantha L Bucktrout; Xiao Wang; Bruce W Bode; Stephen E Gitelman; Peter A Gottlieb; Jing Hughes; Tenshang Joh; Janet B McGill; Jeremy H Pettus; Shobha Potluri; Desmond Schatz; Megan Shannon; Chandrasekhar Udata; Gilbert Wong; Matteo Levisetti; Bishu J Ganguly; Pamela D Garzone Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-12-19