AIM: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and tolerability of different dose regimens of prasugrel in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: This was a single-centered, open-label, parallel-design study. Subjects received a single loading dose (LD) of prasugrel followed by once-daily maintenance dose (MD) for 10 d. They were enrolled into 3 groups: 60 mg LD/10 mg MD; 30 mg LD/7.5 mg MD; 30 mg LD/5 mg MD. Blood samples were collected after the first and last dose. The serum concentration of the active metabolite of prasugrel was determined using a LC/MS/MS method. Platelet aggregation was assessed using the VerifyNow-P2Y(12) assay. RESULTS:Thirty-six healthy native Chinese subjects (19 males) aged 18-45 were enrolled; mean age and body weight were similar across the treatment groups (n=12 for each). The metabolite AUC(0-4) and C(max) increased dose-proportionally across the dose range of 5 mg to 60 mg. The median T(max) was 0.5 h in all groups. The PD parameters, indicated by the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, were met more rapidly in the 60 mg group than the 30 mg group after the LD (94%-98%). This high degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation was maintained following the 10 mg MD (87%-90%) and was lower in the 7.5 mg and 5 mg MD groups (79%-83% and 64%-67%, respectively). Prasugrel was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects for single doses up to 60 mg and a MD of 10 mg for 10 d. CONCLUSION: The PKs and PDs of the active metabolite of prasugrel were similar to those in Chinese subjects reported by a previous bridging study, which demonstrated that the exposure to the active metabolite in Chinese subjects was higher than in Caucasians.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and tolerability of different dose regimens of prasugrel in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: This was a single-centered, open-label, parallel-design study. Subjects received a single loading dose (LD) of prasugrel followed by once-daily maintenance dose (MD) for 10 d. They were enrolled into 3 groups: 60 mg LD/10 mg MD; 30 mg LD/7.5 mg MD; 30 mg LD/5 mg MD. Blood samples were collected after the first and last dose. The serum concentration of the active metabolite of prasugrel was determined using a LC/MS/MS method. Platelet aggregation was assessed using the VerifyNow-P2Y(12) assay. RESULTS: Thirty-six healthy native Chinese subjects (19 males) aged 18-45 were enrolled; mean age and body weight were similar across the treatment groups (n=12 for each). The metabolite AUC(0-4) and C(max) increased dose-proportionally across the dose range of 5 mg to 60 mg. The median T(max) was 0.5 h in all groups. The PD parameters, indicated by the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, were met more rapidly in the 60 mg group than the 30 mg group after the LD (94%-98%). This high degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation was maintained following the 10 mg MD (87%-90%) and was lower in the 7.5 mg and 5 mg MD groups (79%-83% and 64%-67%, respectively). Prasugrel was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects for single doses up to 60 mg and a MD of 10 mg for 10 d. CONCLUSION: The PKs and PDs of the active metabolite of prasugrel were similar to those in Chinese subjects reported by a previous bridging study, which demonstrated that the exposure to the active metabolite in Chinese subjects was higher than in Caucasians.
Authors: B P Smith; F R Vandenhende; K A DeSante; N A Farid; P A Welch; J T Callaghan; S T Forgue Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: David S Small; Prajakti Kothare; Eunice Yuen; D Richard Lachno; Ying G Li; Kenneth J Winters; Nagy A Farid; Lan Ni; Joseph A Jakubowski; Daniel E Salazar; Vivian T Thieu; Christopher D Payne Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: David S Small; Christopher D Payne; Prajakti Kothare; Eunice Yuen; Fanni Natanegara; Mei Teng Loh; Joseph A Jakubowski; D Richard Lachno; Ying G Li; Kenneth J Winters; Nagy A Farid; Lan Ni; Daniel E Salazar; Molly Tomlin; Ronan Kelly Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: David S Small; Ying G Li; C Steven Ernest; John H April; Nagy A Farid; Christopher D Payne; Kenneth J Winters; Shashank Rohatagi; Lan Ni Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Stephen D Wiviott; Eugene Braunwald; Carolyn H McCabe; Gilles Montalescot; Witold Ruzyllo; Shmuel Gottlieb; Franz-Joseph Neumann; Diego Ardissino; Stefano De Servi; Sabina A Murphy; Jeffrey Riesmeyer; Govinda Weerakkody; C Michael Gibson; Elliott M Antman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J T Brandt; S L Close; S J Iturria; C D Payne; N A Farid; C S Ernest; D R Lachno; D Salazar; K J Winters Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: C Steven Ernest; David S Small; Shashank Rohatagi; Daniel E Salazar; Lars Wallentin; Kenneth J Winters; Rebecca E Wrishko Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 2.745