Literature DB >> 2308524

Comparative diagnostic performance of three radiological procedures for the detection of lumbar disk herniation.

J W Kardaun1, O J Kardaun.   

Abstract

Literature data on the diagnostic performance of phlebography, myelography, and CT scan applied to patients with suspected lumbar disk herniation (LDH) are analyzed to extract maximal information about their relative discriminatory power. Seventeen papers meeting the selection criteria contain 13 reports on myelography, 6 on phlebography, and 5 on CT. Sensitivity and specificity are considered simultaneously in logistic ROC space. The reports of each procedure are effectively summarized by a linear regression in logistic ROC space. Taking into account the individual confidence regions of sensitivity and specificity obtained from each report, the slope of the regression line is estimated by Generalized Least Squares (ML). This approach also allows to test the assumption of a common odds ratio (i.e., of a unit slope). The simply to determine common odds ratio as well as the perpendicular distance between the origin and the regression line (as a good approximation to the area under the ROC curve) are used as a measure for the discriminatory power of the procedures. For CT, homogeneity of sensitivity turns out to be much more likely than a common odds ratio. Based on the available, retrospective data, phlebography appears to have the highest performance in visualizing an LDH, followed by myelography and CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2308524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.

Authors:  J J Deeks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

2.  Diagnosis of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Siegman-Igra; A M Anglim; D E Shapiro; K A Adal; B A Strain; B M Farr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: A systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose.

Authors:  Jan Menke; Jörg Kowalski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Chapter 8: meta-analysis of test performance when there is a "gold standard".

Authors:  Thomas A Trikalinos; Cynthia M Balion; Craig I Coleman; Lauren Griffith; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Ben Vandermeer; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Systematic review of diagnostic tests for vaginal trichomoniasis.

Authors:  S R Patel; W Wiese; S C Patel; C Ohl; J C Byrd; C A Estrada
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000

6.  Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mir Said Siadaty; Jianfen Shu
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Petra Macaskill
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.