Literature DB >> 23084871

An experimentally validated finite element method for augmented vertebral bodies.

Michael Kinzl1, Jakob Schwiedrzik, Philippe K Zysset, Dieter H Pahr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Finite element models of augmented vertebral bodies require a realistic modelling of the cement infiltrated region. Most methods published so far used idealized cement shapes or oversimplified material models for the augmented region. In this study, an improved, anatomy-specific, homogenized finite element method was developed and validated to predict the apparent as well as the local mechanical behavior of augmented vertebral bodies.
METHODS: Forty-nine human vertebral body sections were prepared by removing the cortical endplates and scanned with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT before and after injection of a standard and a low-modulus bone cement. Forty-one specimens were tested in compression to measure stiffness, strength and contact pressure distributions between specimens and loading-plates. From the remaining eight, fourteen cylindrical specimens were extracted from the augmented region and tested in compression to obtain material properties. Anatomy-specific finite element models were generated from the CT data. The models featured element-specific, density-fabric-based material properties, damage accumulation, real cement distributions and experimentally determined material properties for the augmented region. Apparent stiffness and strength as well as contact pressure distributions at the loading plates were compared between simulations and experiments.
FINDINGS: The finite element models were able to predict apparent stiffness (R(2)>0.86) and apparent strength (R(2)>0.92) very well. Also, the numerically obtained pressure distributions were in reasonable quantitative (R(2)>0.48) and qualitative agreement with the experiments.
INTERPRETATION: The proposed finite element models have proven to be an accurate tool for studying the apparent as well as the local mechanical behavior of augmented vertebral bodies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084871     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography-based finite element analysis to assess fracture risk and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-20

2.  Methodology to Produce Specimen-Specific Models of Vertebrae: Application to Different Species.

Authors:  Fernando Y Zapata-Cornelio; Gavin A Day; Ruth H Coe; Sebastien N F Sikora; Vithanage N Wijayathunga; Sami M Tarsuslugil; Marlène Mengoni; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sairam Gajavelli; Aaron Gee; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Emil H Schemitsch; Christopher S Bailey; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Computational modelling of bone augmentation in the spine.

Authors:  Sandro D Badilatti; Gisela A Kuhn; Stephen J Ferguson; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Optimizing computational methods of modeling vertebroplasty in experimentally augmented human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  Gavin A Day; Alison C Jones; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.