Literature DB >> 23084867

Development and validation of the "FrOCK": Frankfurt observer communication checklist.

Monika Sennekamp1, Katja Gilbert, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Corina Guethlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate communication behaviour during medical consultations has been shown to improve doctor-patient relationships, and should therefore be an integral part of medical training. In Germany, though, there are almost no reliable and validated checklists for assessing communication skills during medical examinations. Our aim was to develop and validate the first German checklist to examine communication skills that can be used during examinations: the Frankfurt Observer Communication Checklist (FrOCK).
METHODS: The checklist was developed according to a set of requirements that would need to be met by medical training checklists. It was pilot tested, revised and validated over several steps. Data analyses are provided for 371 assessments (371 students) by 17 examiners. After reviewing face validity and comprehensibility, we also checked for validity by comparing a trained and an untrained group of students and testing for both inter- and intrarater reliability. Interrater reliability was analysed by means of 37 interviews that were simultaneously assessed by five examiners. Intrarater reliability was calculated by having three examiners assess the same 37 students at two different points in time.
RESULTS: The final version of FrOCK consists of 31 items for conducting medical interviews which can be broadly divided into four areas: "beginning and conclusion of the interview", "interview technique", "contact skills /empathy" and "history taking". Several aspects of validity could be demonstrated, and both intra- and interrater reliability were high.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that FrOCK is a clear and concise checklist for assessing communication skills in medical examinations and one that satisfies psychometric requirements as well. It takes only 3 to 5minutes to complete and thus is particularly useful for assessing communication skills in medical examinations.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084867     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  7 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Korean version of ComOn coaching for oncology nurses.

Authors:  Myoung Soo Kim; Eun-Jung Bae; Ju-Yeon Uhm
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-01-03

2.  Development of a Web-Based Formative Self-Assessment Tool for Physicians to Practice Breaking Bad News (BRADNET).

Authors:  Anne-Christine Rat; Laetitia Ricci; Francis Guillemin; Camille Ricatte; Manon Pongy; Rachel Vieux; Elisabeth Spitz; Laurent Muller
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-19

3.  Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Daniela Vogel; Marco Meyer; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  How to assess communication skills? Development of the rating scale ComOn Check.

Authors:  K Radziej; J Loechner; C Engerer; M Niglio de Figueiredo; J Freund; H Sattel; C Bachmann; P O Berberat; A Dinkel; A Wuensch
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

5.  Tailored patient therapeutic educational interventions: A patient-centred communication model.

Authors:  Laetitia Ricci; Julie Villegente; Déborah Loyal; Carole Ayav; Joëlle Kivits; Anne-Christine Rat
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Desire and reality--teaching and assessing communicative competencies in undergraduate medical education in German-speaking Europe--a survey.

Authors:  Anja Härtl; Cadja Bachmann; Katharina Blum; Stefan Höfer; Tim Peters; Ingrid Preusche; Bianca Raski; Stefan Rüttermann; Michaela Wagner-Menghin; Alexander Wünsch; Claudia Kiessling
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-11-16

7.  Validity evidence for the Hamburg multiple mini-interview.

Authors:  Mirjana Knorr; Anja Schwibbe; Maren Ehrhardt; Janina Lackamp; Stefan Zimmermann; Wolfgang Hampe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.