Literature DB >> 23084858

[The peer review procedure and its place in medicine].

Ines Chop1, Maria Eberlein-Gonska.   

Abstract

Peer Review literally meaning "re-inspection by a peer" is a special form of external evaluation whose roots go back to Ancient Greece and which is widely employed in science to assess manuscripts submitted for publication. In the medical context the Peer Review process is defined as structured critical self-reflection through dialogue with colleagues. Its prime objective is to improve the quality of patient care by identifying potentials for improvement and by deriving an action plan. Amongst other things, this includes medical standards and guidelines, indications and their traceability, the monitoring of the treatment process as well as the interdisciplinary cooperation and teamwork between different professional groups. The Peer Review practice in Germany has received strong impetus from comprehensive hospital operator projects like IQM, the "Initiative Qualitätsmedizin", and the Peer Review practice in intensive care. This practice, which has primarily been developed by practitioners for practitioners of their own accord, offers the chance to integrate medical quality with little bureaucratic effort and direct transfer of knowledge back into daily clinical work. Another important approach to promote peer reviewer qualifications is the curriculum "Medical Peer Review", which has been published by the German Medical Association since 2011. (As supplied by publisher).
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084858     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Quality assurance concepts in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; J P Braun; R Riessen; R Dubb; A Kaltwasser; T M Bingold
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Freedom of Science - Can Industry Influence What Scientists Publish?

Authors:  Ralph Ziegler; Oliver Schnell; Bernd Kulzer; James Gilbart; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 3.  Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care: Their origins, spread, effectiveness and lacunae- A scoping review.

Authors:  Adrian Rohrbasser; Janet Harris; Sharon Mickan; Kali Tal; Geoff Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  [Evaluation of medical insurance consultant reports within the German Statutory Accident Insurance-Methodology and results of a peer review procedure].

Authors:  D Szczotkowski; C Neik; U Polak; M Wittwer; T Kohlmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.