Literature DB >> 23084671

Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri.

Marianna Alperin1, Seth Kivnick, Kwun Yee Trudy Poon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of perioperative complications associated with laparoscopic hysterectomies performed for very large uteri on an outpatient basis.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive women who underwent total laparoscopic (TLH) or supracervical laparoscopic (LSH) hysterectomy with uterine weight ≥ 500 grams. Clinical, demographic, and surgical characteristics were ascertained. Deviation from a normal intraoperative/perioperative course and readmission rate were assessed. Complications were graded by Dindo morbidity scale. Surgical characteristics and complications were compared between TLH and LSH groups using Chi2 tests for categorical and unpaired t tests for continuous variables. Logistic regressions were performed to identify specific risk factors.
RESULTS: TLH and LSH were performed in 113 (25.3%) and 333 (74.7%) cases, respectively, with no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Median uterine weight was 786 gm (range: 500-4500). Mean operative time was 27 minutes longer in the TLH group: 186.5 ± 58.6 vs. 159.6 ± 53.8 minutes for LSH (P < 0.0001). Life threatening complications (Dindo's grade IV morbidity) occurred in 0.7%. Surgical intervention requiring general anesthesia (IIIB) occurred in 0.45% of cases. Visceral injury was limited to 6 (1.3%) cases of cystotomy. The rate of vascular injury was 0.22%. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 3.4% of cases. 92.8% of patients were discharged on post-operative day zero, with 1.1% readmission rate. There was no association between perioperative morbidity and patient/surgical characteristics.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a viable option for women with very large uteri. Same day discharge of clinically stable patients can be safely implemented.
Copyright © 2012 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084671     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  18 in total

1.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

2.  Impact of obesity on outcomes of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Megan D McMahon; Dana Marie Scott; Erin Saks; Amanda Tower; Christina A Raker; Kristen A Matteson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Standardised Registration of Surgical Complications in Laparoscopic-Gynaecological Therapeutic Procedures Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

Authors:  M P Radosa; G Meyberg-Solomayer; J Radosa; J Vorwergk; K Oettler; A Mothes; S Baum; I Juhasz-Boess; E Petri; E F Solomayer; I B Runnebaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rebi Nahum Halloway; Jennifer Heim; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Colleen Rivard
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Very Large Uteri: a Retrospective Single-Center Experience at a Major University Hospital.

Authors:  Dorit Schöller; Florin-Andrei Taran; Markus Wallwiener; Birgitt Schönfisch; Bernhard Krämer; Harald Abele; Felix Neis; Christian W Wallwiener; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Factors influencing same-day hospital discharge and risk factors for readmission after robotic surgery in the gynecologic oncology patient population.

Authors:  Colleen Rivard; Kelly Casserly; Mary Anderson; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.

Authors:  Dan-Arin Silasi; Taryn Gallo; Michelle Silasi; Gulden Menderes; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Feasibility and safety of outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sarah Maheux-Lacroix; Madeleine Lemyre; Vanessa Couture; Gabrielle Bernier; Philippe Y Laberge
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Advanced gynecologic laparoscopy in a fast-track ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Jillian Main; Chandhana Paka; Rose Soliemannjad; M Ali Parsa
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Large uterus: what is the limit for a laparoscopic approach?

Authors:  Beatriz H Kehde; Bruno J van Herendael; Benedictus Tas; Deepika Jain; Karine Helsen; Lisbeth Jochems
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.