BACKGROUND: Recent research has identified impairment in processing speed, measured by the digit-symbol substitution task, as central to the cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. However, the underlying cognitive correlates of this impairment remain unknown. METHODS: A sample of cases (N=125) meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and a sample of community controls (N=272) from the same geographical area completed a set of putative measures of processing-speed ability to which we implemented confirmatory factor and structural regression modelling in order to elucidate the latent structure of processing speed. Next, we tested the degree to which the structural and relational portions of the model were equal across groups. RESULTS: Processing-speed ability was best defined, in both controls and cases (χ(2)=38.59(26), p=0.053), as a multidimensional cognitive ability consisting of three latent factors comprising: psychomotor speed, sequencing and shifting, and verbal fluency. However, cases exhibited dedifferentiation (i.e., markedly stronger inter-correlations between factors; χ(2)=59.94(29), p<.01) and a reliance on an alternative ensemble of cognitive operations to controls when completing the digit-symbol substitution task. CONCLUSION: Dedifferentiation of processing-speed ability in schizophrenia and subsequent overreliance on alternative (and possibly less than optimal) cognitive operations underlies the marked deficit observed on the digit-symbol substitution task.
BACKGROUND: Recent research has identified impairment in processing speed, measured by the digit-symbol substitution task, as central to the cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. However, the underlying cognitive correlates of this impairment remain unknown. METHODS: A sample of cases (N=125) meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and a sample of community controls (N=272) from the same geographical area completed a set of putative measures of processing-speed ability to which we implemented confirmatory factor and structural regression modelling in order to elucidate the latent structure of processing speed. Next, we tested the degree to which the structural and relational portions of the model were equal across groups. RESULTS: Processing-speed ability was best defined, in both controls and cases (χ(2)=38.59(26), p=0.053), as a multidimensional cognitive ability consisting of three latent factors comprising: psychomotor speed, sequencing and shifting, and verbal fluency. However, cases exhibited dedifferentiation (i.e., markedly stronger inter-correlations between factors; χ(2)=59.94(29), p<.01) and a reliance on an alternative ensemble of cognitive operations to controls when completing the digit-symbol substitution task. CONCLUSION: Dedifferentiation of processing-speed ability in schizophrenia and subsequent overreliance on alternative (and possibly less than optimal) cognitive operations underlies the marked deficit observed on the digit-symbol substitution task.
Authors: Dwight Dickinson; Terry E Goldberg; James M Gold; Brita Elvevåg; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Keith H Nuechterlein; Deanna M Barch; James M Gold; Terry E Goldberg; Michael F Green; Robert K Heaton Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tilo Kircher; Axel Krug; Valentin Markov; Carin Whitney; Sören Krach; Klaus Zerres; Thomas Eggermann; Tony Stöcker; Nadim Jon Shah; Jens Treutlein; Markus M Nöthen; Tim Becker; Marcella Rietschel Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Robert S Kern; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Lyle E Baade; Wayne S Fenton; James M Gold; Richard S E Keefe; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Jim Mintz; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Stephen R Marder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sergi G Costafreda; Cynthia H Y Fu; Lucy Lee; Brian Everitt; Michael J Brammer; Anthony S David Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Samuel R Mathias; Emma E M Knowles; Jennifer Barrett; Olivia Leach; Sebastiano Buccheri; Tamara Beetham; John Blangero; Russell A Poldrack; David C Glahn Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; S Andrea Wijtenburg; Xiaoming Du; Joshua J Chiappelli; Nithin Krishna; Jeffrey West; Florian Muellerklein; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Emma E M Knowles; Mark Weiser; Anthony S David; David C Glahn; Michael Davidson; Abraham Reichenberg Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Emma E M Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Godfrey D Pearlson; Jennifer Barrett; Josephine Mollon; Dominique Denbow; Katrina Aberzik; Molly Zatony; David C Glahn Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Emma E M Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Josephine Mollon; Amanda Rodrigue; Marinka M G Koenis; Thomas D Dyer; Harald H H Goring; Joanne E Curran; Rene L Olvera; Ravi Duggirala; Laura Almasy; John Blangero; David C Glahn Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: L M Rowland; B W Krause; S A Wijtenburg; R P McMahon; J Chiappelli; K L Nugent; S J Nisonger; S A Korenic; P Kochunov; L E Hong Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Max Lam; Jimmy Lee; Attilio Rapisarda; Yuen Mei See; Zixu Yang; Sara-Ann Lee; Nur Amirah Abdul-Rashid; Michael Kraus; Mythily Subramaniam; Siow-Ann Chong; Richard S E Keefe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.596