Literature DB >> 23084387

Pushed monocanalicular intubation: an alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.

Bruno Fayet1, William R Katowitz, Emmanuel Racy, Jean-Marc Ruban, James A Katowitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present our experience with a "pushed" monocanalicular nasolacrimal intubation device in the management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.
METHODS: The cases of consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who were treated with primary probing and intubation with the Masterka were reviewed retrospectively. The Masterka includes a metal guide placed inside a silicone tube for "pushed" intubation as opposed to material attached at the distal end of the silicone for intranasal retrieval ("pulled" intubations). All procedures were accomplished with the patients receiving masked airway anesthesia; neither laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal intubation was necessary. Only patients noted to have a membranous (mucosal) obstruction were considered for treatment with the Masterka. The duration of operation, duration of stent intubation, and severity of symptoms on follow-up were noted. Success was defined as absence of symptoms after stent removal or loss.
RESULTS: A total of 110 eyes of 88 patients were included (average age, 2.4 years; range, 1-8 years). The average operating time was 3 minutes (range, 2-9 minutes). Persistent tearing on follow-up with the stent in place was noted in 26 eyes (24%); tearing resolved after stent removal in 19 eyes (73%). Success was achieved in 94 eyes (85%). with an average follow-up of 33.7 weeks (range, 4-139). Keratitis was noted in 2 eyes (2%). Early stent loss occurred in 17 ducts (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: The Masterka was an effective primary treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction associated with mucosal obstructions in this small series of patients.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084387     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  8 in total

1.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  An update to monocanalicular stent surgery.

Authors:  Bruno Eric Fayet; William R Katowitz; Emmanuel Racy; Jean-Marc Ruban; James A Katowitz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effects of medication methods after simple and effective probing of lacrimal passage.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Hua-Ying Xie; Cai-Ping Shi; Chun-Si Xu; Mei-Hong Gu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Outcomes of lacrimal punctal tumors treated with a superpulse CO2 laser.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Yu-Kuei Lee; Chun-Chieh Lai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Intervention using a novel biodegradable hollow stent containing polylactic acid-polyprolactone-polyethylene glycol complexes against lacrimal duct obstruction disease.

Authors:  Xinyuan Zhan; Xin Guo; Rong Liu; Weikun Hu; Lei Zhang; Nan Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Elena Avram
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

7.  Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.

Authors:  Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby; Rania Assem El Essawy; Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky; Yomna Magdy Ismail
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 8.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.