Evaluation of coronary stenosis with the aid of quantitative image analysis in histological cross sections.

Coronary artery atherosclerosis is a hugely prevalent condition in the Western World and is often encountered during autopsy. Atherosclerotic plaques can cause luminal stenosis: which, if over a significant level (75%), is said to contribute to cause of death. Estimation of stenosis can be macroscopically performed by the forensic pathologists at the time of autopsy or by microscopic examination. This study compares macroscopic estimation with quantitative microscopic image analysis with a particular focus on the assessment of significant stenosis (>75%). A total of 131 individuals were analysed. The sample consists of an atherosclerotic group (n=122) and a control group (n=9). The results of the two methods were significantly different from each other (p=0.001) and the macroscopic method gave a greater percentage stenosis by an average of 3.5%. Also, histological examination of coronary artery stenosis yielded a difference in significant stenosis in 11.5% of cases. The differences were attributed to either histological quantitative image analysis underestimation; gross examination overestimation; or, a combination of both. The underestimation may have come from tissue shrinkage during tissue processing for histological specimen. The overestimation from the macroscopic assessment can be attributed to the lumen shape, to the examiner observer error or to a possible bias to diagnose coronary disease when no other cause of death is apparent. The results indicate that the macroscopic estimation is open to more biases and that histological quantitative image analysis only gives a precise assessment of stenosis ex vivo. Once tissue shrinkage, if any, is accounted for then histological quantitative image analysis will yield a more accurate assessment of in vivo stenosis. It may then be considered a complementary tool for the examination of coronary stenosis.