PURPOSE:Dating violence (DV)--physical, sexual, and psychological aggression in adolescent romantic relationships--is prevalent among youth. Despite broad calls for primary prevention, few programs with demonstrated effectiveness exist. This cluster-randomized trial examined the effectiveness of a DV perpetration prevention programtargeting coaches and high school male athletes. METHODS: The unit of randomization was the high school (16 schools), and the unit of analysis was the athlete (N = 2,006 students). Primary outcomes were intentions to intervene, recognition of abusive behaviors, and gender-equitable attitudes. Secondary outcomes explored bystander behaviors and abuse perpetration. Regression models for clustered, longitudinal data assessed between-arm differences in over-time changes in mean levels of continuous outcomes in 1,798 athletes followed up at 3 months. RESULTS: Intervention athletes' changes in intentions to intervene were positive compared with control subjects, resulting in an estimated intervention effect of .12 (95% CI: .003, .24). Intervention athletes also reported higher levels of positive bystander intervention behavior than control subjects (.25, 95% CI: .13, .38). Changes in gender-equitable attitudes, recognition of abusive behaviors, and DV perpetration were not significant. Secondary analyses estimated intervention impacts according to intensity of program implementation. Compared with control subjects, athletes exposed to full-intensity implementation of the intervention demonstrated improvements in intentions to intervene (.16, 95% CI: .04, .27), recognition of abusive behaviors (.13, 95% CI: .003, .25), and positive bystander intervention (.28, 95% CI: .14, .41). CONCLUSION: This cluster-randomized controlled trial supports the effectiveness of a school athletics-based prevention program as one promising strategy to reduce DV perpetration.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Dating violence (DV)--physical, sexual, and psychological aggression in adolescent romantic relationships--is prevalent among youth. Despite broad calls for primary prevention, few programs with demonstrated effectiveness exist. This cluster-randomized trial examined the effectiveness of a DV perpetration prevention program targeting coaches and high school male athletes. METHODS: The unit of randomization was the high school (16 schools), and the unit of analysis was the athlete (N = 2,006 students). Primary outcomes were intentions to intervene, recognition of abusive behaviors, and gender-equitable attitudes. Secondary outcomes explored bystander behaviors and abuse perpetration. Regression models for clustered, longitudinal data assessed between-arm differences in over-time changes in mean levels of continuous outcomes in 1,798 athletes followed up at 3 months. RESULTS: Intervention athletes' changes in intentions to intervene were positive compared with control subjects, resulting in an estimated intervention effect of .12 (95% CI: .003, .24). Intervention athletes also reported higher levels of positive bystander intervention behavior than control subjects (.25, 95% CI: .13, .38). Changes in gender-equitable attitudes, recognition of abusive behaviors, and DV perpetration were not significant. Secondary analyses estimated intervention impacts according to intensity of program implementation. Compared with control subjects, athletes exposed to full-intensity implementation of the intervention demonstrated improvements in intentions to intervene (.16, 95% CI: .04, .27), recognition of abusive behaviors (.13, 95% CI: .003, .25), and positive bystander intervention (.28, 95% CI: .14, .41). CONCLUSION: This cluster-randomized controlled trial supports the effectiveness of a school athletics-based prevention program as one promising strategy to reduce DV perpetration.
Authors: Martina Delle Donne; Kimberly DeLaCruz; Khadija Khan; Wilka Diaz; Jasmin Salcedo; Sophia English; Victoria Banyard; Robert Stephenson; Mary Haviland; Victoria Frye Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Vangie A Foshee; Thad Benefield; Kimberly S Dixon; Ling-Yin Chang; Virginia Senkomago; Susan T Ennett; Kathryn E Moracco; J Michael Bowling Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2015-03-17
Authors: Elizabeth Miller; Kelley A Jones; Heather L McCauley; Dana L Rofey; Duncan B Clark; Janine M Talis; Jocelyn C Anderson; Carla D Chugani; Robert W S Coulter; Kaleab Z Abebe Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Katie M Edwards; Victoria L Banyard; Stephanie N Sessarego; Emily A Waterman; Kimberly J Mitchell; Hong Chang Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-02-14
Authors: Sarah DeGue; Thomas R Simon; Kathleen C Basile; Sue Lin Yee; Karen Lang; Howard Spivak Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 2.681