Literature DB >> 23084094

The influence of differences in the functioning of the neurocognitive attentional networks on drivers' performance.

Javier Roca1, David Crundall, Sergio Moreno-Ríos, Cándida Castro, Juan Lupiáñez.   

Abstract

Considerable research efforts are currently being devoted to analysing the role that the attentional system plays in determining driving behaviour, with the ultimate objective of reducing the number of attention-related accidents. The present study aims to assess the influence of differences in the functioning of the three attentional networks (executive control, attentional orienting and alerting) when drivers have to deal with some common hazardous situations, for example, when an oncoming car or a pedestrian unexpectedly crosses their trajectory. Multiple measures of participants' attentional functioning were obtained from a computer-based neurocognitive test: the Attention Networks Test for Interactions and Vigilance (ANTI-V). These measures were compared to performance in a driving simulator where different types of hazardous situations were presented. Correlation and linear regression analyses revealed significant associations between individual attentional measures and driving performance in specific traffic situations. In particular, a higher attentional orienting score on the ANTI-V was associated with safer driving in situations where a single precursor anticipated the hazard source, whereas in complex situations with multiple potential hazard precursors, higher attentional orienting scores were associated with delayed braking. Additionally, partial evidence of a relationship between crash occurrence and the functioning of the executive control and the alerting networks was found. Overall, the current research would be helpful to better understand the role that each attentional network (executive control, attentional orienting and alerting) play in safe driving, and thus to develop efficient countermeasures to reduce attention-related crashes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084094     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

Review 1.  Adolescence, attention allocation, and driving safety.

Authors:  Daniel Romer; Yi-Ching Lee; Catherine C McDonald; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  A link between attentional function, effective eye movements, and driving ability.

Authors:  Andrew K Mackenzie; Julie M Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.

Authors:  Linfeng Hu; Dingzhong Feng; Yelang Li; Jinwu Xu; Jiehui Zheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  The Multiple Object Avoidance (MOA) task measures attention for action: Evidence from driving and sport.

Authors:  Andrew K Mackenzie; Mike L Vernon; Paul R Cox; David Crundall; Rosie C Daly; Duncan Guest; Alexander Muhl-Richardson; Christina J Howard
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-11-16

5.  The neural basis of hazard perception differences between novice and experienced drivers - An fMRI study.

Authors:  Seifollah Gharib; Arash Zare-Sadeghi; Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian; Mohsen Reza Haidari
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.068

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.