Literature DB >> 23083969

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in simulated pediatric intubation.

Aaron J Donoghue1, Anne M Ades, Akira Nishisaki, Ellen S Deutsch.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine whether videolaryngoscopy results in a higher prevalence of first-attempt intubation success and improved glottic visualization than direct laryngoscopy when performed by pediatric emergency medicine providers in simulated patients.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study at a single institution. Fellows and faculty in pediatric emergency medicine were invited to participate. Each subject performed intubations on 3 simulators (newborn, infant, adult), using a videolaryngoscope; each simulator was intubated by each subject with and without use of video. Primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success; secondary outcome was percentage of glottic opening score (POGO).
RESULTS: Twenty-six participants performed 156 intubations; complete data were available for 148 intubations. First-attempt success in the neonate was 88%; in the infant, 79%; and in the adult, 60%. In the adult simulator, videolaryngoscopy use showed a first-attempt success in 81% of subjects compared with 39% with direct laryngoscopy (difference 43%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18% to 67%). There was no difference in first-attempt success rates between videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in the newborn or infant simulators. Videolaryngoscopy use led to increased POGO scores in all 3 simulators, with a difference of 25% (95% CI 2% to 48%) in newborn simulators, 23% (95% CI 2% to 48%) in infant simulators, and 42% (95% CI 18% to 66%) in adult simulators.
CONCLUSION: Videolaryngoscopy was associated with greater first-attempt success during intubation by pediatric emergency physicians on an adult simulator. POGO score was significantly improved in all 3 simulators with videolaryngoscopy.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083969     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  14 in total

1.  Trend and Outcomes of Video Laryngoscope Use Across PICUs.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Grunwell; Pradip P Kamat; Michael Miksa; Ashwin Krishna; Karen Walson; Dennis Simon; Conrad Krawiec; Ryan Breuer; Jan Hau Lee; Eleanor Gradidge; Keiko Tarquinio; Asha Shenoi; Justine Shults; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Tracheal intubation of pediatric manikins during ongoing chest compressions. Does Glidescope® videolaryngoscope improve pediatric residents' performance?

Authors:  Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Jose Moure-González; Silvia Rodríguez-Blanco; Ignacio Oulego-Erroz; Paula Rodríguez-Rivas; Julio Cortiñas-Díaz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Process conformance is associated with successful first intubation attempt and lower odds of adverse events in a paediatric emergency setting.

Authors:  Karen J O'Connell; Sen Yang; Megan Cheng; Alexis B Sandler; Niall H Cochrane; JaeWon Yang; Rachel B Webman; Ivan Marsic; Randall Burd
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Video Assisted Laryngoscope Facilitates Intubation Skill Learning in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Su Ann Yong; Chung-Hsien Chaou; Shiuan-Ruey Yu; Jen-Tse Kuan; Chih-Chung Lin; Hung-Pin Liu; Te-Fa Chiu
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  Is a haptic simulation interface more effective than computer mouse-based interface for neonatal intubation skills training?

Authors:  Anup Agarwal; Julie Leviter; Candace Mannarino; Orly Levit; Lindsay Johnston; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-05-08

6.  Do you see what I see? A randomised pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of simulation-based training with videolaryngoscopy for neonatal intubation.

Authors:  Lindsay C Johnston; Ruijun Chen; Travis M Whitfill; Christie J Bruno; Orly L Levit; Marc A Auerbach
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-05-20

7.  A prospective observational study of video laryngoscopy-guided coaching in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Laverriere; John E Fiadjoe; Nancy McGowan; Benjamin B Bruins; Natalie Napolitano; Ichiro Watanabe; Nicole K Yamada; Catharine M Walsh; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Comparison of direct and video laryngoscope endotracheal intubations by pediatric residents: A study of a child model with normal airway.

Authors:  Ayşe Berna Anil; Murat Anil; Fatih Durak; Ümüt Altuğ; Gökçen Özçifçi; Gülşen Yalçın; Şule Demir
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 9.  Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Ridhima Sharma; Nishkarsh Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

10.  Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope and Glidescope for Infant Tracheal Intubation by Anesthesiologists during Cardiopulmonary Arrest Simulation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujiwara; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Sayuri Matsunami; Daisuke Okada; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.