Literature DB >> 23083803

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is prevalent and increasing in Stockholm County, Sweden, Despite no recommendations for PSA screening: results from a population-based study, 2003-2011.

Tobias Nordström1, Markus Aly, Mark S Clements, Caroline E Weibull, Jan Adolfsson, Henrik Grönberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has increased in several countries. There is incomplete knowledge of PSA testing patterns.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of PSA testing and explore patterns of PSA retesting in Stockholm County, Sweden. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based study was performed. Through registry linkages, we collected population information, data on PSA tests, pathology reports, and clinical information. The study population comprised males living in Stockholm County in 2011 (n=1034129), of which 229 872 had a PSA test during the period 2003-2011. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We determined limited-duration-point prevalence of PSA testing and performed survival analysis on PSA retesting for men aged 40-89 yr. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The number of PSA tests increased from 54239 in 2003 to 124613 in 2011. During the 9-yr study period, 46%, 68%, and 77% of men without a prior prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and aged 50-59 yr, 60-69 yr, and 70-79 yr, respectively, had a PSA test. During 2010 and 2011, 25%, 40%, and 46% of men aged 50-59 yr, 60-69 yr, and 70-79 yr, respectively, had a PSA test. The prevalence of PSA testing increased from 2003 to 2011. The probability of retesting was PSA and age dependent, with a 26-mo cumulative incidence of 0.337 (95% confidence interval, 0.333-0.341) if the first PSA value was <1 ng/ml. The main limitations were (1) that PSA data prior to 2003 were not available and (2) that the study cohort was restricted to men who were alive in 2011.
CONCLUSIONS: Although screening for PCa is not recommended in Sweden, PSA testing in Stockholm County was high across ages ranging from 40 to 89 yr and increased during the period 2003-2011. The probability of PSA retesting was high, regardless of the original PSA level. These results contrast with current clinical recommendations and raise calls for a change, either through structured PCa testing or more detailed guidelines on PSA testing.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083803     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  27 in total

1.  Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Andrew Vickers; Melissa Assel; Hans Lilja; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Future directions in prostate cancer testing: a comment upon results from the prospective population-based diagnostic STHLM3 study-Grönberg H et al. Lancet Oncology. 2015 Nov 9; doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Martin Eklund; Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Eighteen-year follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: effect of sociodemographic variables on participation, prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Sigrid V Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Anna Grenabo Bergdahl; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.612

4.  Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Undisclosed Prostate Cancer Screening in a Sample of Predominantly Immigrant Black Men.

Authors:  Stephen J Lepore; Rasmi G Nair; Stacy N Davis; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch; Nigel Thomas; Celia Shmukler; Ralph Ullman
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-12

5.  A positive family history as a risk factor for prostate cancer in a population-based study with organised prostate-specific antigen screening: results of the Swiss European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Aarau).

Authors:  Marco Randazzo; Alexander Müller; Sigrid Carlsson; Daniel Eberli; Andreas Huber; Rainer Grobholz; Lukas Manka; Ashkan Mortezavi; Tullio Sulser; Franz Recker; Maciej Kwiatkowski
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Uptake of Active Surveillance for Very-Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Sweden.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; Caitlin Curnyn; David Robinson; Ola Bratt; Pär Stattin
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Results from 22 years of Followup in the Göteborg Randomized Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Maria Frånlund; Marianne Månsson; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Gunnar Aus; Erik Holmberg; Karin Stinesen Kollberg; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 7.600

8.  Prostate cancer mortality in areas with high and low prostate cancer incidence.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Sigrid Carlsson; Benny Holmström; Andrew Vickers; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja; Håkan Jonsson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Causes of death in men with localized prostate cancer: a nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Yasin Folkvaljon; Jan Adolfsson; Olof Akre; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: rationale and treatment opportunities.

Authors:  V Kasivisvanathan; M Emberton; H U Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.