Literature DB >> 23083059

Setting realistic recovery targets for two interacting endangered species, sea otter and northern abalone.

Iadine Chadès1, Janelle M R Curtis, Tara G Martin.   

Abstract

Failure to account for interactions between endangered species may lead to unexpected population dynamics, inefficient management strategies, waste of scarce resources, and, at worst, increased extinction risk. The importance of species interactions is undisputed, yet recovery targets generally do not account for such interactions. This shortcoming is a consequence of species-centered legislation, but also of uncertainty surrounding the dynamics of species interactions and the complexity of modeling such interactions. The northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) and one of its preferred prey, northern abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana), are endangered species for which recovery strategies have been developed without consideration of their strong predator-prey interactions. Using simulation-based optimization procedures from artificial intelligence, namely reinforcement learning and stochastic dynamic programming, we combined sea otter and northern abalone population models with functional-response models and examined how different management actions affect population dynamics and the likelihood of achieving recovery targets for each species through time. Recovery targets for these interacting species were difficult to achieve simultaneously in the absence of management. Although sea otters were predicted to recover, achieving abalone recovery targets failed even when threats to abalone such as predation and poaching were reduced. A management strategy entailing a 50% reduction in the poaching of northern abalone was a minimum requirement to reach short-term recovery goals for northern abalone when sea otters were present. Removing sea otters had a marginally positive effect on the abalone population but only when we assumed a functional response with strong predation pressure. Our optimization method could be applied more generally to any interacting threatened or invasive species for which there are multiple conservation objectives.
© 2012 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083059     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01951.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Strategies for sustainable management of renewable resources during environmental change.

Authors:  Emilie Lindkvist; Örjan Ekeberg; Jon Norberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Genetic features of Haliotis discus hannai by infection of vibrio and virus.

Authors:  Jennifer Im; Heui-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 1.839

3.  Managing Genetic Diversity and Extinction Risk for a Rare Plains Bison (Bison bison bison) Population.

Authors:  Seth G Cherry; Jerod A Merkle; Marie Sigaud; Daniel Fortin; Greg A Wilson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Solving multi-objective optimization problems in conservation with the reference point method.

Authors:  Yann Dujardin; Iadine Chadès
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.