BACKGROUND: Plantar pressure reduction is mandatory for diabetic foot ulcer healing. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a new walking strategy learned by biofeedback on plantar pressure distribution under both feet in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. METHODS: Terminally augmented biofeedback has been used for foot off-loading training in 21 patients with diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy. The biofeedback technique was based on a subjective estimation of performance and objective visual feedback following walking sequences. The patient was considered to have learned a new walking strategy as soon as the peak plantar pressure (PPP) under the previously defined at-risk zone was within a range of 40-80% of baseline PPP in 70% of the totality of steps and during three consecutive walking sequences. The PPP was measured by a portable in-shoe foot pressure measurement system (PEDAR(®)) at baseline (T0), directly after learning (T1) and at 10-day retention test (T2). RESULTS: The PPP under at-risk zones decreased significantly at T1 (165 ± 9 kPa, p < 0.0001) and T2 (167 ± 11, p = 0.001), as compared with T0 (242 ± 12 kPa) without any increase of the PPP elsewhere. At the contralateral foot (not concerned by off-loading), the PPP was slightly higher under the lateral midfoot at T1 (68 ± 8 kPa, p = 0.01) and T2 (65 ± 8 kPa, p = 0.01), as compared with T0 (58 ± 6 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: The foot off-loading by biofeedback leads to a safe and regular plantar pressure distribution without inducing any new 'at-risk' area under both feet.
BACKGROUND: Plantar pressure reduction is mandatory for diabetic foot ulcer healing. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a new walking strategy learned by biofeedback on plantar pressure distribution under both feet in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. METHODS: Terminally augmented biofeedback has been used for foot off-loading training in 21 patients with diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy. The biofeedback technique was based on a subjective estimation of performance and objective visual feedback following walking sequences. The patient was considered to have learned a new walking strategy as soon as the peak plantar pressure (PPP) under the previously defined at-risk zone was within a range of 40-80% of baseline PPP in 70% of the totality of steps and during three consecutive walking sequences. The PPP was measured by a portable in-shoe foot pressure measurement system (PEDAR(®)) at baseline (T0), directly after learning (T1) and at 10-day retention test (T2). RESULTS: The PPP under at-risk zones decreased significantly at T1 (165 ± 9 kPa, p < 0.0001) and T2 (167 ± 11, p = 0.001), as compared with T0 (242 ± 12 kPa) without any increase of the PPP elsewhere. At the contralateral foot (not concerned by off-loading), the PPP was slightly higher under the lateral midfoot at T1 (68 ± 8 kPa, p = 0.01) and T2 (65 ± 8 kPa, p = 0.01), as compared with T0 (58 ± 6 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: The foot off-loading by biofeedback leads to a safe and regular plantar pressure distribution without inducing any new 'at-risk' area under both feet.
Authors: Michelle R Kaminski; Jonathan Golledge; Joel W J Lasschuit; Karl-Heinz Schott; James Charles; Jane Cheney; Anita Raspovic Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Jane S S P Ferreira; Isabel C N Sacco; Alisson A Siqueira; Maria H M Almeida; Cristina D Sartor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Q Silva; E Y Suda; D P Santos; J L Veríssimo; J S S P Ferreira; R H Cruvinel Júnior; R L Monteiro; C D Sartor; I C N Sacco Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Érica Q Silva; Danilo P Santos; Raquel I Beteli; Renan L Monteiro; Jane S S P Ferreira; Ronaldo H Cruvinel-Junior; Asha Donini; Jady L Verissímo; Eneida Y Suda; Isabel C N Sacco Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Katie E Chatwin; Caroline A Abbott; Andrew J M Boulton; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 4.876