BACKGROUND: Flexible work schedules and on-call work are becoming more and more common in working life. However, little is known about the effects of on-call work on health. METHODS: Using a daily survey method, 31 employees from an Information Technology Service Organisation filled out a questionnaire four times a week while they were on call and another four times a week while they were not on call. An evaluation of cortisol levels was included. Multilevel analyses were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Results showed increases in irritation and negative mood and decreases in social activities, household activities, and low-effort activities. No effects were found concerning the secretion of cortisol. There were no significant differences between those employees who were actually called in to work during the on-call period and those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible work schedules like on-call work have effects on well-being. The mere possibility of being disturbed by calls shows negative consequences, regardless of whether the employees are actually called in or not.
BACKGROUND: Flexible work schedules and on-call work are becoming more and more common in working life. However, little is known about the effects of on-call work on health. METHODS: Using a daily survey method, 31 employees from an Information Technology Service Organisation filled out a questionnaire four times a week while they were on call and another four times a week while they were not on call. An evaluation of cortisol levels was included. Multilevel analyses were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Results showed increases in irritation and negative mood and decreases in social activities, household activities, and low-effort activities. No effects were found concerning the secretion of cortisol. There were no significant differences between those employees who were actually called in to work during the on-call period and those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible work schedules like on-call work have effects on well-being. The mere possibility of being disturbed by calls shows negative consequences, regardless of whether the employees are actually called in or not.
Authors: Bernadette Roberts; Grace E Vincent; Sally A Ferguson; Amy C Reynolds; Sarah M Jay Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Amy C Reynolds; Sally A Ferguson; Sarah L Appleton; Meagan E Crowther; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Tiffany K Gill; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Robert J Adams Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2021-05-31
Authors: Madeline Sprajcer; Sarah L Appleton; Robert J Adams; Tiffany K Gill; Sally A Ferguson; Grace E Vincent; Jessica L Paterson; Amy C Reynolds Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carla M Ziebertz; Madelon L M van Hooff; Debby G J Beckers; Wendela E Hooftman; Michiel A J Kompier; Sabine A E Geurts Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Anna Arlinghaus; Philip Bohle; Irena Iskra-Golec; Nicole Jansen; Sarah Jay; Lucia Rotenberg Journal: Ind Health Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.179