Literature DB >> 23081664

TGF-β-superfamily signaling regulates embryonic stem cell heterogeneity: self-renewal as a dynamic and regulated equilibrium.

Katherine E Galvin-Burgess1, Emily D Travis, Kelsey E Pierson, Jay L Vivian.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells dynamically fluctuate between phenotypic states, as defined by expression levels of genes such as Nanog, while remaining pluripotent. The dynamic phenotype of stem cells is in part determined by gene expression control and dictated by various signaling pathways and transcriptional regulators. We sought to define the activities of two TGF-β-related signaling pathways, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Nodal signaling, in modulating mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell heterogeneity in undifferentiated culture conditions. Both BMP and Nodal signaling pathways were seen to be active in distinct Nanog subpopulations, with subtle quantitative differences in activity. Pharmacological and genetic modulation of BMP or Nodal signaling strongly influenced the heterogeneous state of undifferentiated ES cells, as assessed by dynamic expression of Nanog reporters. Inhibition of Nodal signaling enhanced BMP activity, which through the downstream target Id factors, enhanced the capacity of ES cells to remain in the Nanog-high epigenetic state. The combined inhibition of Nodal and BMP signaling resulted in the accumulation of Nanog-negative cells, even in the presence of LIF, uncovering a shared role for BMP and Nodal signaling in maintaining Nanog expression and repression of differentiation. These results demonstrate a complex requirement for both arms of TGF-β-related signaling to influence the dynamic cellular phenotype of undifferentiated ES cells in serum-based media, and that differing subpopulations of ES cells in heterogeneous culture have distinct responses to these signaling pathways. Several pathways, including BMP, Nodal, and FGF signaling, have important regulatory function in defining the steady-state distribution of heterogeneity of stem cells.
Copyright © 2012 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23081664      PMCID: PMC3528825          DOI: 10.1002/stem.1252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  48 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of the murine Nanog gene promoter.

Authors:  Da Yong Wu; Zhen Yao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  Maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency by Nanog-mediated reversal of mesoderm specification.

Authors:  Atsushi Suzuki; Angel Raya; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Masanobu Morita; Takaaki Matsui; Kinichi Nakashima; Fred H Gage; Concepción Rodríguez-Esteban; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-03

3.  Delivery of short hairpin RNAs--triggers of gene silencing--into mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Christoph Schaniel; Feng Li; Xenia L Schafer; Troy Moore; Ihor R Lemischka; Patrick J Paddison
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Repression of Nanog gene transcription by Tcf3 limits embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Laura Pereira; Fei Yi; Bradley J Merrill
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Clonal isolation of hESCs reveals heterogeneity within the pluripotent stem cell compartment.

Authors:  Morag H Stewart; Marc Bossé; Kristin Chadwick; Pablo Menendez; Sean C Bendall; Mickie Bhatia
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Yuin-Han Loh; Qiang Wu; Joon-Lin Chew; Vinsensius B Vega; Weiwei Zhang; Xi Chen; Guillaume Bourque; Joshy George; Bernard Leong; Jun Liu; Kee-Yew Wong; Ken W Sung; Charlie W H Lee; Xiao-Dong Zhao; Kuo-Ping Chiu; Leonard Lipovich; Vladimir A Kuznetsov; Paul Robson; Lawrence W Stanton; Chia-Lin Wei; Yijun Ruan; Bing Lim; Huck-Hui Ng
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-05       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Nanog binds to Smad1 and blocks bone morphogenetic protein-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Atsushi Suzuki; Ángel Raya; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Masanobu Morita; Takaaki Matsui; Kinichi Nakashima; Fred H Gage; Concepción Rodríguez-Esteban; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The Grb2/Mek pathway represses Nanog in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Takashi Hamazaki; Sarah M Kehoe; Toru Nakano; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Michele Boiani; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  A continuum of cell states spans pluripotency and lineage commitment in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Shelley R Hough; Andrew L Laslett; Sean B Grimmond; Gabriel Kolle; Martin F Pera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers.

Authors:  Saiful Islam; Amit Zeisel; Simon Joost; Gioele La Manno; Pawel Zajac; Maria Kasper; Peter Lönnerberg; Sten Linnarsson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Concise review: pursuing self-renewal and pluripotency with the stem cell factor Nanog.

Authors:  Arven Saunders; Francesco Faiola; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Pluripotency gene network dynamics: System views from parametric analysis.

Authors:  Ilya R Akberdin; Nadezda A Omelyanchuk; Stanislav I Fadeev; Natalya E Leskova; Evgeniya A Oschepkova; Fedor V Kazantsev; Yury G Matushkin; Dmitry A Afonnikov; Nikolay A Kolchanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The pituitary TGFβ1 system as a novel target for the treatment of resistant prolactinomas.

Authors:  M Victoria Recouvreux; M Andrea Camilletti; Daniel B Rifkin; Graciela Díaz-Torga
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Pluripotency factors and Polycomb Group proteins repress aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Chia-I Ko; Qin Wang; Yunxia Fan; Ying Xia; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.020

6.  MGE-Like Neural Progenitor Cell Survival and Expression of Parvalbumin and Proenkephalin in a Jaundiced Rat Model of Kernicterus.

Authors:  Fu-Chen Yang; Jay L Vivian; Catherine Traxler; Steven M Shapiro; John A Stanford
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.139

7.  STAT3 phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 and serine 727 differentially regulates mouse ESC fates.

Authors:  Guanyi Huang; Hexin Yan; Shoudong Ye; Chang Tong; Qi-Long Ying
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 8.  Generating cartilage repair from pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Aixin Cheng; Timothy E Hardingham; Susan J Kimber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Derivation of stable embryonic stem cell-like, but transcriptionally heterogenous, induced pluripotent stem cells from non-permissive mouse strains.

Authors:  Tiffany A Garbutt; Kranti Konganti; Thomas Konneker; Andrew Hillhouse; Drake Phelps; Alexis Jones; David Aylor; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.224

Review 10.  Cell Cycle-Driven Heterogeneity: On the Road to Demystifying the Transitions between "Poised" and "Restricted" Pluripotent Cell States.

Authors:  Amar M Singh
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.