Literature DB >> 23079877

A comparison of two approaches for the closed treatment of low-energy tibial fractures in children.

Mauricio Silva1, Michael J Eagan, Melissa A Wong, Daniel H Dichter, Edward Ebramzadeh, Lewis E Zionts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many orthopaedic surgeons treat tibial shaft fractures in children with a period of non-weight-bearing after application of a long leg cast, presumably to prevent fracture angulation and shortening. We hypothesized that allowing children to immediately bear weight as tolerated in a cast with the knee in 10° of flexion would lessen disability, without increasing the risk of unacceptable shortening or angulation.
METHODS: We divided eighty-one children, between the ages of four and fourteen years, with a low-energy, closed tibial shaft fracture into two groups. One group (forty children) received a long leg cast with the knee flexed 60° and were asked not to bear weight. The second group (forty-one children) received a long leg cast with the knee flexed 10° and were encouraged to bear weight as tolerated. All patients were switched to short leg walking casts at four weeks. We compared time to healing, overall alignment, shortening, and physical disability as determined by the Activities Scale for Kids-Performance (ASK-P) questionnaire.
RESULTS: The mean time to fracture union was 10.8 weeks in both groups (p = 0.47). At the time of healing, mean coronal alignment was within 1.3° in both groups, mean sagittal alignment was within 1°, and mean shortening was <0.5 mm, with no significant differences. The ASK-P scores showed that both groups had overall improvement in physical functioning over time. However, at six weeks, the children who were allowed to bear weight as tolerated had better overall scores (p = 0.03) and better standing skills (p = 0.01) than those who were initially instructed to be non-weight-bearing.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with low-energy tibial shaft fractures can be successfully managed by immobilizing the knee in 10° of flexion and encouraging early weight-bearing, without affecting the time to union or increasing the risk of angulation and shortening at the fracture site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23079877     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  3 in total

1.  A Retrospective Comparison of Above- vs Below-the-Knee Cast Treatment for Salter Harris-II Distal Tibia Fractures.

Authors:  Suhas P Dasari; Vasil V Kukushliev; Alexander R Graf; Xue-Cheng Liu; Scott E Van Valin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-01-21

2.  Loss of Reduction and Malunion After Cortical Perforation During Flexible Nailing of an Open Tibia Fracture.

Authors:  Justin Aflatooni; Andrew George; Aharon Z Gladstein
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-03

3.  Pediatric tibial shaft and distal metaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Osman Civan; Bahadır Alimoğlu; Mustafa İçen; Selim Taşkın; Ali Cavit; Yetkin Söyüncü; Mustafa Ürgüden
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.