Literature DB >> 2307987

Prognostic significance of surface marker expression on blasts of patients with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia.

I Schwarzinger1, P Valent, U Köller, C Marosi, B Schneider, O Haas, W Knapp, K Lechner, P Bettelheim.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of the expression of surface membrane antigens on the blasts of 123 consecutive patients with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) was evaluated. For this purpose, reactivity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) CLB-ERY3 (antiblood-group H antigen), VIM-D5 (CD15), WT1 (CD7), MY7 (CD13), MY9 (CD33), VID-1 (antihuman leukocyte antigen locus DR [anti-HLA DR]), VIM-2 (CDw65L), VIM-13 (CD14), 63D3 (CD14) and anti-TdT with leukemic blast cell populations was prospectively analyzed with respect to the rates of complete remission (CR), continuous complete remission (CCR), and survival. The overall rate of CR was 65%, the 6-year rates of overall CCR and survival were 23% and 13%, respectively (median period of patient observation, 30 months). Of all Abs tested, four (CLB-ERY3, MY7, anti-TdT, and VIM-D5) were found to be of prognostic value. Reactivity of CLB-ERY3, MY7, and anti-TdT was predictive for CR (CLB-ERY3+, 43% v CLB-ERY3-, 73%, P less than .02; MY7+, 59% v MY7-, 91%, P less than .003; TdT+, 28% v TdT-, 71%, P less than .001, respectively) and probability of survival (significantly lower survival rates: CLB-ERY3+, P less than .02; MY7+, P less than .03; and TdT+ cases, P less than .001, respectively). Reactivity of VIM-D5 was significantly associated with a higher probability of CCR (P less than .01). Our results confirm earlier reports on the prognostic significance of expression of CD13 and TdT in AML and indicate CLB-ERY3 (antiblood-group H antibody) and VIM-D5 (CD15) as further markers predictive for the clinical outcome in patients with de novo AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2307987     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.3.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

1.  Classical Hodgkin's disease. Clinical impact of the immunophenotype.

Authors:  R von Wasielewski; M Mengel; R Fischer; M L Hansmann; K Hübner; J Franklin; H Tesch; U Paulus; M Werner; V Diehl; A Georgii
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  The diagnosis of acute leukemia with undifferentiated or minimally differentiated blasts.

Authors:  M B van't Veer
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Significant association between expression of the CD11b surface molecule and favorable outcome for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Zahra Amirghofran; Maryam Zakerinia; Azra Shamseddin
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  CD19-positive acute myeloblastic leukemia with trisomy 21 as a sole acquired karyotypic abnormality.

Authors:  Hua-feng Wang; Yi-zhi Cheng; Huan-ping Wang; Zhi-mei Chen; Ji-yu Lou; Jie Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Prognostic significance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian A Webber; Melissa M Cushing; Shiyong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  Prognostic implications of CD14 positivity in acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yunsuk Choi; Je-Hwan Lee; Sung-Doo Kim; Dae-Young Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Miee Seol; Young-Ah Kang; Mijin Jeon; Ah Rang Jung; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Granulocytic sarcoma of the prostate as the first manifestation of a late relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  F Thalhammer; H Gisslinger; A Chott; O Haas; A Etele-Hainz; T Helbich; R Kusec; W Linkesch; I Simonitsch; H Strobl
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 8.  Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Leukemia.

Authors:  Anne M Dickinson; Jean Norden; Shuang Li; Ilona Hromadnikova; Christoph Schmid; Helga Schmetzer; Hans Jochem-Kolb
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Acute myeloid leukemia targets for bispecific antibodies.

Authors:  S S Hoseini; N K Cheung
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Integrated nuclear proteomics and transcriptomics identifies S100A4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bader Alanazi; Chinmay R Munje; Namrata Rastogi; Andrew J K Williamson; Samuel Taylor; Paul S Hole; Marie Hodges; Michelle Doyle; Sarah Baker; Amanda F Gilkes; Steven Knapper; Andrew Pierce; Anthony D Whetton; Richard L Darley; Alex Tonks
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.528

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.