OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an accurate, affordable, and feasible method to screen and treat HIV-infected women so that cervical cancer can be prevented among them. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in India in which eligible HIV-infected women underwent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI), cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and colposcopy. METHODS: We screened women with cytology, HPV testing, VIA, and VILI. All screened women had colposcopy and women with colposcopic abnormalities had directed biopsies. Women with suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on colposcopy were treated with cold coagulation or loop excision. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the screening tests were calculated. RESULTS: : Among 1128 women screened, 55 (4.9%) had CIN2-3 lesions. Sensitivity for VIA, VILI, cytology at atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) threshold and HPV testing was 83.6, 89.1, 63.3, and 94.6%, and specificity was 88.8, 89.3, 94.5, and 77.4%, respectively, in detecting CIN2/3 lesions. Cytology had significantly lower sensitivity and higher specificity than VIA, VILI, and HPV testing. Sequential testing with VIA/VILI, HPV testing/VIA, HPV testing/VILI, and HPV testing/VIA/VILI had more balanced sensitivity and specificity than the single tests. Cold coagulation was well tolerated and cured 80% of CIN2-3 based on preliminary results at 6-month to 1-year follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential testing with VIA and VILI is the most feasible screening approach for cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women in low-resource countries. When HPV testing becomes feasible and affordable, HPV testing followed by VIA/VILI may be considered.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an accurate, affordable, and feasible method to screen and treat HIV-infectedwomen so that cervical cancer can be prevented among them. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in India in which eligible HIV-infectedwomen underwent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI), cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and colposcopy. METHODS: We screened women with cytology, HPV testing, VIA, and VILI. All screened women had colposcopy and women with colposcopic abnormalities had directed biopsies. Women with suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on colposcopy were treated with cold coagulation or loop excision. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the screening tests were calculated. RESULTS: : Among 1128 women screened, 55 (4.9%) had CIN2-3 lesions. Sensitivity for VIA, VILI, cytology at atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) threshold and HPV testing was 83.6, 89.1, 63.3, and 94.6%, and specificity was 88.8, 89.3, 94.5, and 77.4%, respectively, in detecting CIN2/3 lesions. Cytology had significantly lower sensitivity and higher specificity than VIA, VILI, and HPV testing. Sequential testing with VIA/VILI, HPV testing/VIA, HPV testing/VILI, and HPV testing/VIA/VILI had more balanced sensitivity and specificity than the single tests. Cold coagulation was well tolerated and cured 80% of CIN2-3 based on preliminary results at 6-month to 1-year follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential testing with VIA and VILI is the most feasible screening approach for cervical cancer screening in HIV-infectedwomen in low-resource countries. When HPV testing becomes feasible and affordable, HPV testing followed by VIA/VILI may be considered.
Authors: Sanghyuk S Shin; Catherine L Carpenter; Maria L Ekstrand; Qiao Wang; Surbhi Grover; Nicola M Zetola; Kartik Yadav; Sanjeev Sinha; Adeline M Nyamathi Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Jenell S Coleman; Michelle S Cespedes; Susan Cu-Uvin; Rose J Kosgei; May Maloba; Jean Anderson; Timothy Wilkin; Antoine Jaquet; Julia Bohlius; Kathryn Anastos; Kara Wools-Kaloustian Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Megan J Huchko; Jennifer Sneden; George Sawaya; Karen Smith-McCune; May Maloba; Naila Abdulrahim; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Michael H Chung; Kevin P McKenzie; Hugo De Vuyst; Barbra A Richardson; Farzana Rana; Ritesh Pamnani; Julia W Njoroge; Evans Nyongesa-Malava; Samah R Sakr; Grace C John-Stewart; Nelly R Mugo Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jean Anderson; Megan Wysong; Deb Estep; Giulia Besana; Sharon Kibwana; John Varallo; Kai Sun; Enriquito Lu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240