Literature DB >> 23079513

Adding value to laboratory medicine: a professional responsibility.

Graham H Beastall1.   

Abstract

Laboratory medicine is a medical specialty at the centre of healthcare. When used optimally laboratory medicine generates knowledge that can facilitate patient safety, improve patient outcomes, shorten patient journeys and lead to more cost-effective healthcare. Optimal use of laboratory medicine relies on dynamic and authoritative leadership outside as well as inside the laboratory. The first responsibility of the head of a clinical laboratory is to ensure the provision of a high quality service across a wide range of parameters culminating in laboratory accreditation against an international standard, such as ISO 15189. From that essential baseline the leadership of laboratory medicine at local, national and international level needs to 'add value' to ensure the optimal delivery, use, development and evaluation of the services provided for individuals and for groups of patients. A convenient tool to illustrate added value is use of the mnemonic 'SCIENCE'. This tool allows added value to be considered in seven domains: standardisation and harmonisation; clinical effectiveness; innovation; evidence-based practice; novel applications; cost-effectiveness; and education of others. The assessment of added value in laboratory medicine may be considered against a framework that comprises three dimensions: operational efficiency; patient management; and patient behaviours. The profession and the patient will benefit from sharing examples of adding value to laboratory medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23079513     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Laboratory Biosafety Gaps: Lessons Learned from Past Outbreaks Reveal a Path to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Nancy E Cornish; Nancy L Anderson; Diego G Arambula; Matthew J Arduino; Andrew Bryan; Nancy C Burton; Bin Chen; Beverly A Dickson; Judith G Giri; Natasha K Griffith; Michael A Pentella; Reynolds M Salerno; Paramjit Sandhu; James W Snyder; Christopher A Tormey; Elizabeth A Wagar; Elizabeth G Weirich; Sheldon Campbell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 50.129

2.  External quality assessment in resource-limited countries.

Authors:  Jane Y Carter
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Essential in-vitro laboratory diagnostic services provision in accordance with the WHO standards in Guragae zone primary health care unit level, South Ethiopia.

Authors:  Teha Shumbej; Sofia Menu; Teklemichael Gebru; Tadele Girum; Fitsum Bekele; Absra Solomon; Dereje Mesfin; Abdulewhab Jemal
Journal:  Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines       Date:  2020-03-06

4.  Multicenter Survey of Physicians' Perception of Interpretative Commenting and Reflective Testing in Nigeria.

Authors:  Lucius Chidiebere Imoh; Chinelo Pamela Onyenekwu; Kenneth Ogar Inaku; Alexander Oghielu Abu; Chibuzo David Tagbo; Idris Yahaya Mohammed; Modupe Akinrele Kuti
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2021-02-28

5.  Current Issues, Challenges, and Future Perspectives in Clinical Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Ferdinando Mannello; Mario Plebani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Adding Value in the Postanalytical Phase.

Authors:  Éva Ajzner
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-04-20

7.  Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Test Results.

Authors: 
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-02-09

8.  Comprehensive evaluation of the internal and external quality control to redefine analytical quality goals.

Authors:  Beatriz Varela; Gonzalo Pacheco
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.