Literature DB >> 23079315

Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes.

Jan M Vetter1, Melissa Faust, Adrian Gericke, Norbert Pfeiffer, Wolf E Weingärtner, Walter Sekundo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare intraocular pressures (IOPs) during flap preparations performed using 2 femtosecond lasers and a mechanical microkeratome in human donor globes.
SETTING: University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, and Euroeyes Clinic Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: A cannula was inserted through the optic nerve in human globes. The IOP was obtained continuously during flap preparation using the 60 kHz Intralase femtosecond laser, the 200 kHz Visumax femtosecond laser, or the Amadeus II microkeratome. For each experiment, a normal lamellar flap preparation (regular procedure) and a worst-case procedure (femtosecond laser interface was pressed against globe until docking maneuver was aborted) were performed.
RESULTS: During the regular procedure, the mean maximum IOP measured was 181.3 mm Hg (range 159.1 to 194.8 mm Hg) with the 60 kHz femtosecond laser, 77.6 mm Hg (range 58.1 to 100.3 mm Hg) with the 200 kHz femtosecond laser, and 198.1 mm Hg (range 162.8 to 299.6 mm Hg) with the microkeratome. During the worst-case procedure, the maximum measured IOP was 319.7 mm Hg (range 299.1 to 341.2 mm Hg) with the 60 kHz laser and 120.4 mm Hg (range 118.1 to 134.7 mm Hg) with the 200 kHz laser.
CONCLUSION: Maximum IOPs during corneal flap preparations in human enucleated eyes were lower during performance of a regular procedure and a worst-case procedure with the 200 kHz femtosecond laser than with the 60 kHz femtosecond laser and the mechanical microkeratome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Sekundo is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23079315     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  10 in total

1.  Transient effect of suction on the retinal neurovasculature in myopic patients after small-incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Jiayan Liu; Rahul Singh Tonk; Amy Michelle Huang; Elaine Han; Carol L Karp; Minzhi Zeng; Huyong Zou; Yu Zheng; Wei Luo; Xiangyin Sha; Zhiping Liu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Bilateral Iris Atrophy after the Femtosecond Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Surgery.

Authors:  Kenan Olcay; Akin Cakir; Sercan Koray Sagdic; Eyup Duzgun; Yildiray Yildirim
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2015-06-14

3.  Comparison of intra-ocular pressure changes with liquid or flat applanation interfaces in a femtosecond laser platform.

Authors:  G P Williams; H P Ang; B L George; Y C Liu; G Peh; L Izquierdo; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Excimer versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy: Intraoperative Pitfalls.

Authors:  Moatasem El-Husseiny; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Elena Akhmedova; Nora Szentmary; Tobias Hager; Themistoklis Tsintarakis; Edgar Janunts
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Changes in corneal deformation parameters after lenticule creation and extraction during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Jing Zhao; Peijun Yao; Huamao Miao; Lingling Niu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal transplantation with a low-energy, liquid-interface system.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Liu; Fernando Morales-Wong; Moushmi Patil; Sang Beom Han; Nyein C Lwin; Ericia Pei Wen Teo; Heng Pei Ang; Nur Zah M Yussof; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

8.  Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness following mechanical microkeratome-assisted versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Authors:  Mohamed Hosny; Rania M Zaki; Rania A Ahmed; Noha Khalil; Hoda M Mostafa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-25

9.  Contralateral assessment of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK) microkeratome suction duration on laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap characteristics.

Authors:  Mohamed Omar Yousif; Nizar Saleh Abdelfattah; Amira A Zayed; Ashraf H Soliman
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-20

10.  Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Andreas Katsanos; Esther Arranz-Marquez; Rafael Cañones; Gorka Lauzirika; Isabel Rodríguez-Perez; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.