H Khurana1, R K Pandey, A K Saksena, A Kumar. 1. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Vitamin E (E) and Pycnogenol (P) in treatment of Chemotherapy-Related Oral Mucositis (ChROM) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 children, aged between 6 and 15 years, with ChROM were selected and randomly divided into three groups after assessment of oral mucositis (OM) by WHO grading system. Glycerine (control), E, and P were topically applied in group I, II, and III, respectively, and the prognosis of OM was assessed by functional, objective, and subjective parameters. RESULTS: Patients of group II and III showed significant improvement when ChROM was analyzed through scoring systems - WHO grading, Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), and Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale (ChIMES) as compared to group I (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between groups II and III. CONCLUSION: Both the drugs E and P per se are effective for treatment of OM with P being not effective for the treatment of severe mucositis (grade 4). Combination of E and P and additional agents may be tried for better results.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Vitamin E (E) and Pycnogenol (P) in treatment of Chemotherapy-Related Oral Mucositis (ChROM) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 children, aged between 6 and 15 years, with ChROM were selected and randomly divided into three groups after assessment of oral mucositis (OM) by WHO grading system. Glycerine (control), E, and P were topically applied in group I, II, and III, respectively, and the prognosis of OM was assessed by functional, objective, and subjective parameters. RESULTS:Patients of group II and III showed significant improvement when ChROM was analyzed through scoring systems - WHO grading, Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), and Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale (ChIMES) as compared to group I (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between groups II and III. CONCLUSION: Both the drugs E and P per se are effective for treatment of OM with P being not effective for the treatment of severe mucositis (grade 4). Combination of E and P and additional agents may be tried for better results.
Authors: Wanessa Miranda-Silva; Wagner Gomes-Silva; Yehuda Zadik; Noam Yarom; Abdul Rahman Al-Azri; Catherine H L Hong; Anura Ariyawardana; Deborah P Saunders; M Elvira Correa; Praveen R Arany; Joanne Bowen; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Wim J E Tissing; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea L Radossi; Katherine Taromina; Stacey Marjerrison; Caroline J Diorio; Raquel Similio; Festus Njuguna; Glenn M Afungchwi; Elena J Ladas Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nathaniel S Treister; Michael Nieder; Christina Baggott; Ellen Olson; Tammy Lo; Xichen Jin; Yun Gao; Lu Chen; Ha Dang; Lillian Sung Journal: Oral Dis Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 4.068
Authors: Claudio Pulito; Antonio Cristaudo; Caterina La Porta; Stefano Zapperi; Giovanni Blandino; Aldo Morrone; Sabrina Strano Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-10-07