Emily C Taylor1, Nathan C Nickel, Miriam H Labbok. 1. The Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7445, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding is a proven approach to support breastfeeding in maternity settings; however, scant literature exists on the relative impact and interpretation of each step on breastfeeding. We assessed the Ten Steps and their relationship with in-hospital breastfeeding rates at facilities serving low-wealth populations and explored the outcomes to identify step-specific actions. METHODS: We present descriptive and nonparametric comparisons and qualitative findings to examine the relationship between the Ten Steps and breastfeeding rates from each hospital using baseline data collection. RESULTS: Some steps (1--policy, 2--training, 4--skin-to-skin, 6--no supplements, and 9--no artificial nipples, followed by 3--prenatal counseling, 7--rooming-in) reflected differences in relative baseline breastfeeding rates between settings. Key informant interviews revealed misunderstanding of some steps. CONCLUSIONS: Self-appraisal may be less valid when not all elements of the criteria for evaluating Step implementation may be fully understood. Limited exposure and understanding may lead to self-appraisal errors, resulting in scores that are not reflective of actual practices. Nonetheless, the indication that breastfeeding rates may be better mirrored by a defined subset of steps may provide some constructive insight toward prioritizing implementation activities and simplifying assessment. These issues will be further explored in the next phase of this study.
OBJECTIVES: The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding is a proven approach to support breastfeeding in maternity settings; however, scant literature exists on the relative impact and interpretation of each step on breastfeeding. We assessed the Ten Steps and their relationship with in-hospital breastfeeding rates at facilities serving low-wealth populations and explored the outcomes to identify step-specific actions. METHODS: We present descriptive and nonparametric comparisons and qualitative findings to examine the relationship between the Ten Steps and breastfeeding rates from each hospital using baseline data collection. RESULTS: Some steps (1--policy, 2--training, 4--skin-to-skin, 6--no supplements, and 9--no artificial nipples, followed by 3--prenatal counseling, 7--rooming-in) reflected differences in relative baseline breastfeeding rates between settings. Key informant interviews revealed misunderstanding of some steps. CONCLUSIONS: Self-appraisal may be less valid when not all elements of the criteria for evaluating Step implementation may be fully understood. Limited exposure and understanding may lead to self-appraisal errors, resulting in scores that are not reflective of actual practices. Nonetheless, the indication that breastfeeding rates may be better mirrored by a defined subset of steps may provide some constructive insight toward prioritizing implementation activities and simplifying assessment. These issues will be further explored in the next phase of this study.
Authors: Kenneth D Rosenberg; John D Stull; Michelle R Adler; Laurin J Kasehagen; Andrea Crivelli-Kovach Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: M S Kramer; B Chalmers; E D Hodnett; Z Sevkovskaya; I Dzikovich; S Shapiro; J P Collet; I Vanilovich; I Mezen; T Ducruet; G Shishko; V Zubovich; D Mknuik; E Gluchanina; V Dombrovskiy; A Ustinovitch; T Kot; N Bogdanovich; L Ovchinikova; E Helsing Journal: JAMA Date: 2001 Jan 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nathan C Nickel; Patricia J Martens; Dan Chateau; Marni D Brownell; Joykrishna Sarkar; Chun Yan Goh; Elaine Burland; Carole Taylor; Alan Katz Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2014-07-31
Authors: Adam K Lewkowitz; Nandini Raghuraman; Julia D López; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Maria Adriana Burgio; Antonio Simone Laganà; Angela Sicilia; Romana Prosperi Porta; Maria Grazia Porpora; Helena Ban Frangež; Giovanni DI Venti; Onofrio Triolo Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.429
Authors: Dennis P Watson; Erin L Adams; Sarah Shue; Heather Coates; Alan McGuire; Jeremy Chesher; Joanna Jackson; Ogbonnaya I Omenka Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Kathleen C Parry; Kathryn Wouk; Gigi C Lawless; Jacquana L Smith; Abigail R Smetana; Julia F Bourg; Michelle J Hendricks; Catherine S Sullivan Journal: J Hum Lact Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 2.219