OBJECTIVES: We explored the notion that social disadvantage increases vulnerability to the health effects of environmental hazards. Specifically, we examined (1) whether race modifies the association between blood lead and blood pressure and (2) whether socioeconomic status (SES) plays a role in this modifying effect. METHODS: Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2008) and linear regression, we estimated the association between blood lead and blood pressure. Using interactions among race, SES, and lead, we estimated this association by levels of social disadvantage. RESULTS: Black men and women showed a 2.8 (P < .001) and 4.0 (P < .001) millimeters mercury increase in SBP, respectively, for each doubling of blood lead. White adults showed no association. This lead-SBP association exhibited by Blacks was primarily isolated to Blacks of low SES. For example, poor but not nonpoor Black men showed a 4.8 millimeters mercury (P < .001) increase in SBP for each doubling of blood lead. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that social disadvantage exacerbates the deleterious health effects of lead. Our work provides evidence that social and environmental factors must be addressed together to eliminate health disparities.
OBJECTIVES: We explored the notion that social disadvantage increases vulnerability to the health effects of environmental hazards. Specifically, we examined (1) whether race modifies the association between blood lead and blood pressure and (2) whether socioeconomic status (SES) plays a role in this modifying effect. METHODS: Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2008) and linear regression, we estimated the association between blood lead and blood pressure. Using interactions among race, SES, and lead, we estimated this association by levels of social disadvantage. RESULTS: Black men and women showed a 2.8 (P < .001) and 4.0 (P < .001) millimeters mercury increase in SBP, respectively, for each doubling of blood lead. White adults showed no association. This lead-SBP association exhibited by Blacks was primarily isolated to Blacks of low SES. For example, poor but not nonpoor Black men showed a 4.8 millimeters mercury (P < .001) increase in SBP for each doubling of blood lead. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that social disadvantage exacerbates the deleterious health effects of lead. Our work provides evidence that social and environmental factors must be addressed together to eliminate health disparities.
Authors: Ketan Shankardass; Rob McConnell; Michael Jerrett; Joel Milam; Jean Richardson; Kiros Berhane Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marie S O'Neill; Michael Jerrett; Ichiro Kawachi; Jonathan I Levy; Aaron J Cohen; Nelson Gouveia; Paul Wilkinson; Tony Fletcher; Luis Cifuentes; Joel Schwartz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Srimathi Kannan; J Timothy Dvonch; Barbara A Israel; Alex Allen; Sherman A James; James S House; James Lepkowski Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jane E Clougherty; Jonathan I Levy; Laura D Kubzansky; P Barry Ryan; Shakira Franco Suglia; Marina Jacobson Canner; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Junenette L Peters; Laura Kubzansky; Eileen McNeely; Joel Schwartz; Avron Spiro; David Sparrow; Robert O Wright; Huiling Nie; Howard Hu Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Felisa A Gonzales; Rena R Jones; Julianna Deardorff; Gayle C Windham; Robert A Hiatt; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Ruth S Shim; Peter Baltrus; L DiAnne Bradford; Kisha B Holden; Edith Fresh; Lonnie E Fuller Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.798