Literature DB >> 23078438

A prospective multicenter evaluation of a new side-port endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration in solid upper gastrointestinal lesions.

Arthur J Kaffes1, Robert Ym Chen, William Tam, Ian Norton, Sarah Cho, Ben Devereaux, Rhys Vaughan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) varies depending on the equipment used and the site targeted. Multiple needle passes are usually required to obtain a diagnosis. A new needle incorporating a side-port carries a theoretical advantage regarding acquisition of cytological material. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Olympus side-port needle in solid upper gastrointestinal indications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter evaluation of patients referred for EUS-FNA for solid lesions was performed across six tertiary gastroenterology referral centers in four capital cities in Australia. The main outcome measures include cytological diagnosis, number of needle passes required for diagnosis and complication rates.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (17 men; 13 women) with a mean age of 67.5 years were studied. Indications included pancreatic or biliary mass in 24 patients, retroperitoneal or periduodenal mass in 2, enlarged lymph node in 2, a gastric submucosal tumor in 1 and a subcarinal mass in 1. The mean size of the lesions was 3.47 cm (range, 0.5-8 cm). All but one case had a diagnosis made (96.7%). The mean number of passes required to reach a diagnosis was 1.7. In neoplastic lesions the diagnosis was made with a mean of 1.6 passes. No complications were encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: The new EUS-FNA needle with side port appears effective and safe in solid upper gastrointestinal EUS-FNA indications.
© 2012 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2012 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23078438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

2.  A prospective randomized study of the difference in diagnostic yield between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUSFNA) needles with and without a side port in pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; Andrew Boon Eu Kwek; Dong Wan Seo; Woo Hyun Paik; Tsu-Yao Cheng; Hsiu-Po Wang; James Lau
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: How to obtain a core biopsy?

Authors:  Lorenzo Fuccio; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 4.  Fine-needle biopsy: should this be the first choice in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition?

Authors:  Eun Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Which needle is better for diagnosing subepithelial lesions?

Authors:  Eun Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Reliability of Endoscopic Ultrasound Using Miniprobes and Grayscale Histogram Analysis in Diagnosing Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions.

Authors:  Samiullah Khan; Rui Zhang; Weili Fang; Tao Wang; Shu Li; Danna Wang; Yixiang Chang; Lanping Zhu; Bang-Mao Wang; Wentian Liu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.