PURPOSE: To evaluate tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor (AI) initiation over time and by patient characteristics among women diagnosed with breast cancer in a community setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,501 women age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with stages I to II invasive, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from 2001 to 2008 in an integrated delivery system. Using automated pharmacy dispensings, we determined endocrine therapy receipt within 12 months of diagnosis. We used generalized linear models to estimate adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for any endocrine therapy use (v none), tamoxifen use (v none), AI use (v none), and AIs first (v tamoxifen). Each model adjusted for age, stage, body mass index, tumor size, lymph node status, comorbidities, other treatment, and diagnosis year. RESULTS: Tamoxifen use was at its highest (56.9%) in 2001 and then decreased; AI use was lowest in 2001 (5.5%) and then peaked in 2005 (36.8%). In multivariate models, women age ≥ 65 years were less likely to use any endocrine therapy compared with women age 55 to 64 years (age 65 to 74 years: RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; age ≥ 75 years: RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81). Women age ≥ 75 years were significantly less likely to begin AIs versus no treatment (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.64) and versus tamoxifen (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97). Women with tumor sizes 1.0 to 1.9 cm and ≥ 2.0 cm were significantly more likely to use any endocrine therapy compared with women with tumor sizes < 1.0 cm (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.61 and RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.81, respectively). CONCLUSION: Differential initiation over time, as well as by age and tumor size, suggests patient preferences and provider recommendations for endocrine therapy vary, despite guideline recommendations.
PURPOSE: To evaluate tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor (AI) initiation over time and by patient characteristics among women diagnosed with breast cancer in a community setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,501 women age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with stages I to II invasive, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from 2001 to 2008 in an integrated delivery system. Using automated pharmacy dispensings, we determined endocrine therapy receipt within 12 months of diagnosis. We used generalized linear models to estimate adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for any endocrine therapy use (v none), tamoxifen use (v none), AI use (v none), and AIs first (v tamoxifen). Each model adjusted for age, stage, body mass index, tumor size, lymph node status, comorbidities, other treatment, and diagnosis year. RESULTS:Tamoxifen use was at its highest (56.9%) in 2001 and then decreased; AI use was lowest in 2001 (5.5%) and then peaked in 2005 (36.8%). In multivariate models, women age ≥ 65 years were less likely to use any endocrine therapy compared with women age 55 to 64 years (age 65 to 74 years: RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; age ≥ 75 years: RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81). Women age ≥ 75 years were significantly less likely to begin AIs versus no treatment (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.64) and versus tamoxifen (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97). Women with tumor sizes 1.0 to 1.9 cm and ≥ 2.0 cm were significantly more likely to use any endocrine therapy compared with women with tumor sizes < 1.0 cm (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.61 and RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.81, respectively). CONCLUSION: Differential initiation over time, as well as by age and tumor size, suggests patient preferences and provider recommendations for endocrine therapy vary, despite guideline recommendations.
Authors: Shelley M Enger; Soe Soe Thwin; Diana S M Buist; Terry Field; Floyd Frost; Ann M Geiger; Timothy L Lash; Marianne Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aliza K Fink; Jerry Gurwitz; William Rakowski; Edward Guadagnoli; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Linda C Harlan; Limin X Clegg; Jeffrey Abrams; Jennifer L Stevens; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Erin J Aiello; Diana S M Buist; Edward H Wagner; Leah Tuzzio; Sarah M Greene; Lois E Lamerato; Terry S Field; Lisa J Herrinton; Reina Haque; Gene Hart; Kimberly J Bischoff; Ann M Geiger Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; Harold J Burstein; Antonio C Wolff; Kathleen I Pritchard; James N Ingle; Rowan T Chlebowski; Richard Gelber; Stephan B Edge; Julie Gralow; Melody A Cobleigh; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lori J Goldstein; Timothy J Whelan; Trevor J Powles; John Bryant; Cheryl Perkins; Judy Perotti; Susan Braun; Amy S Langer; George P Browman; Mark R Somerfield Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth T Loggers; Hongyuan Gao; Laura S Gold; Larry Kessler; Ruth Etzioni; Diana Sm Buist Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Erin J Aiello Bowles; Cody Ramin; Diana S M Buist; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Sheila Weinmann; Lene H S Veiga; Clara Bodelon; Rochelle E Curtis; Jacqueline B Vo; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Gretchen L Gierach Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Filipa Lynce; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Calvin Chao; Vanessa B Sheppard; Yingjun Zhou; Chunfu Liu; Nandini Selvam; Marc D Schwartz; Arnold L Potosky Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Can Zhou; Jian jun He; Jing Li; Jin hu Fan; Bin Zhang; Hong jian Yang; Xiao ming Xie; Zhong hua Tang; Hui Li; Jia yuan Li; Shu lian Wang; You lin Qiao; Rong Huang; Pin Zhang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Saladores; T Mürdter; D Eccles; B Chowbay; N K Zgheib; S Winter; B Ganchev; B Eccles; S Gerty; A Tfayli; J S L Lim; Y S Yap; R C H Ng; N S Wong; R Dent; M Z Habbal; E Schaeffeler; M Eichelbaum; W Schroth; M Schwab; H Brauch Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Hazel B Nichols; Erin J A Bowles; Jessica Islam; Lawrence Madziwa; Til Stürmer; Diem-Thy Tran; Diana S M Buist Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-01-14