Literature DB >> 23077188

Perspectives and progress on upper levels of intake in the United States.

Christine L Taylor1, Linda D Meyers.   

Abstract

In the US, recognition of the appropriateness of including an upper level of intake estimate among reference values for nutrient substances was made in 1994 when the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) specified the inclusion of an "upper safe" level among its proposed reference points for intake of nutrients and food components. By 1998, a group convened by the IOM had established a risk assessment model for establishing upper intake levels for nutrients, eventually termed the tolerable upper intake levels (UL). A risk assessment framework (i.e., a scientific undertaking intended to characterize the nature and likelihood of harm resulting from human exposure to agents in the environment), as developed in other fields of study, was a logical fit for application to nutrients. But importantly, whereas risk assessment requires that information be organized in specific ways, it does not require specific scientific evaluation methods. Rather, it makes transparent and documents the decision-making that occurs given the available data and the related uncertainties. During the 1990s and beyond, the various IOM committees charged with developing UL for a range of nutrients utilized the risk assessment framework, making modifications and adjustments as dictated by the data. This experience informed the general organizational process for establishing UL but also underscored the dearth of data. For many reasons, undertaking scientific research and obtaining data about the effects of excessive intake have been challenging. It is time to consider creative and focused strategies for modeling, simulating, and otherwise studying the effects of excessive intake of nutrient substances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23077188      PMCID: PMC3497966          DOI: 10.3945/jn.112.159087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  4 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc.

Authors:  P Trumbo; A A Yates; S Schlicker; M Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Highlights of 'a model for establishing upper levels of intake for nutrients and related substances: report of a Joint FAO/WHO Technical Workshop on Nutrient Risk Assessment, May 2-6, 2005'.

Authors:  Christine Lewis Taylor
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a cross-disciplinary mode-of-action based approach to examining dose-response and thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth Julien; Alan R Boobis; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

4.  Application of a key events dose-response analysis to nutrients: a case study with vitamin A (retinol).

Authors:  A Catharine Ross; Robert M Russell; Sanford A Miller; Ian C Munro; Joseph V Rodricks; Elizabeth A Yetley; Elizabeth Julien
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

  4 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Concepts in Nutrient Needs.

Authors:  Patrick J Stover; Cutberto Garza; Jane Durga; Martha S Field
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Discretionary fortification--a public health perspective.

Authors:  Tarasuk Valerie
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.