BACKGROUND: Visual vertigo (VV) symptoms improve only when customized vestibular rehabilitation (VR) integrates exposure to optokinetic stimuli (OK). However, equipment is expensive, biweekly sessions are not standard practice, and therapy is often unsupervised. METHODS: A controlled, parallel-group comparison was made of patients' responses to an 8-week customized program incorporating OK training via a full-field visual environment rotator (group OKF) or DVD (an optokinetic disc or drum rotating at 40° or 60° s(-1)), supervised (group OKS) or unsupervised (group OKU). A total of 60 participants with chronic peripheral vestibular symptoms were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups: group OKF (n = 20) or OKS (n = 20), in which participants attended weekly sessions and were prescribed customized home exercises incorporating the DVD, or group OKU (n = 20) who practiced customized exercises and the DVD unsupervised. Treatment response was assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks with dynamic posturography, Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and questionnaires for symptoms, symptom triggers, and psychological state. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were present at baseline or at post interventions. All groups showed significant within-group improvements for vestibular (ie, lightheadedness), VV, and autonomic symptoms (P < .05). Posturography and FGA improved significantly for groups OKF and OKS (P ≤ .01) as well as anxiety scores for group OKS (P < .05) and depression for group OKF (P < .05). Migraine significantly affected VV improvement (migraineurs improved more; P = .01). The drop-out rate was 55% for group OKU and 10% for each supervised group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The DVD may be an effective and economical method of integrating OK into VR. However, rehabilitation should be supervised for greater compliance and improvements, particularly for postural stability and psychological state.
BACKGROUND: Visual vertigo (VV) symptoms improve only when customized vestibular rehabilitation (VR) integrates exposure to optokinetic stimuli (OK). However, equipment is expensive, biweekly sessions are not standard practice, and therapy is often unsupervised. METHODS: A controlled, parallel-group comparison was made of patients' responses to an 8-week customized program incorporating OK training via a full-field visual environment rotator (group OKF) or DVD (an optokinetic disc or drum rotating at 40° or 60° s(-1)), supervised (group OKS) or unsupervised (group OKU). A total of 60 participants with chronic peripheral vestibular symptoms were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups: group OKF (n = 20) or OKS (n = 20), in which participants attended weekly sessions and were prescribed customized home exercises incorporating the DVD, or group OKU (n = 20) who practiced customized exercises and the DVD unsupervised. Treatment response was assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks with dynamic posturography, Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and questionnaires for symptoms, symptom triggers, and psychological state. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were present at baseline or at post interventions. All groups showed significant within-group improvements for vestibular (ie, lightheadedness), VV, and autonomic symptoms (P < .05). Posturography and FGA improved significantly for groups OKF and OKS (P ≤ .01) as well as anxiety scores for group OKS (P < .05) and depression for group OKF (P < .05). Migraine significantly affected VV improvement (migraineurs improved more; P = .01). The drop-out rate was 55% for group OKU and 10% for each supervised group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The DVD may be an effective and economical method of integrating OK into VR. However, rehabilitation should be supervised for greater compliance and improvements, particularly for postural stability and psychological state.
Authors: Courtney D Hall; Susan J Herdman; Susan L Whitney; Stephen P Cass; Richard A Clendaniel; Terry D Fife; Joseph M Furman; Thomas S D Getchius; Joel A Goebel; Neil T Shepard; Sheelah N Woodhouse Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Nayer Rassaian; Navid G Sadeghi; Bardia Sabetazad; Kathleen M McNerney; Robert F Burkard; Soroush G Sadeghi Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Angelique Van Ombergen; Astrid J Lubeck; Vincent Van Rompaey; Leen K Maes; John F Stins; Paul H Van de Heyning; Floris L Wuyts; Jelte E Bos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240