BACKGROUND: Although most countries now have at least some restrictions on tobacco marketing, the tobacco industry meet these restrictions by re-allocating expenditure to unregulated channels, such as at point-of-purchase. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 10 Canadian provinces in the International Tobacco Control Survey was analysed to examine adult smokers' support for a ban on tobacco advertising and displays in stores and whether this support is associated with noticing either advertising or displays in stores, and quit intentions, over time. In total, there were 4580 respondents in wave 5 (October 2006 to February 2007), wave 6 (September 2007 to February 2008) and wave 7 (October 2008 to June 2009). The surveys were conducted before, during and in some cases after the implementation of display bans in most Canadian provinces and territories. RESULTS: Smokers in all provinces showed strong support for a ban on tobacco displays over the study period. Levels of support for an advertising and display ban were comparable between Canadian provinces over time, irrespective of whether they had been banned or not. Noticing tobacco displays and signs in-store was demonstrably less likely to predict support for display (OR=0.73, p=0.005) and advertising (OR=0.78, p=0.02) ban, respectively. Smokers intending to quit were more likely to support advertising and display bans over time. CONCLUSION: This study serves as a timely reminder that the implementation of tobacco control measures, such as the removal of tobacco displays, appear to sustain support among smokers, those most likely to oppose such measures.
BACKGROUND: Although most countries now have at least some restrictions on tobacco marketing, the tobacco industry meet these restrictions by re-allocating expenditure to unregulated channels, such as at point-of-purchase. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 10 Canadian provinces in the International Tobacco Control Survey was analysed to examine adult smokers' support for a ban on tobacco advertising and displays in stores and whether this support is associated with noticing either advertising or displays in stores, and quit intentions, over time. In total, there were 4580 respondents in wave 5 (October 2006 to February 2007), wave 6 (September 2007 to February 2008) and wave 7 (October 2008 to June 2009). The surveys were conducted before, during and in some cases after the implementation of display bans in most Canadian provinces and territories. RESULTS: Smokers in all provinces showed strong support for a ban on tobacco displays over the study period. Levels of support for an advertising and display ban were comparable between Canadian provinces over time, irrespective of whether they had been banned or not. Noticing tobacco displays and signs in-store was demonstrably less likely to predict support for display (OR=0.73, p=0.005) and advertising (OR=0.78, p=0.02) ban, respectively. Smokers intending to quit were more likely to support advertising and display bans over time. CONCLUSION: This study serves as a timely reminder that the implementation of tobacco control measures, such as the removal of tobacco displays, appear to sustain support among smokers, those most likely to oppose such measures.
Authors: Ann McNeill; Sarah Lewis; Casey Quinn; Maurice Mulcahy; Luke Clancy; Gerard Hastings; Richard Edwards Journal: Tob Control Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Louise M Hassan; Cheryl Higbee; Christian Boudreau; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Mi Yan; Mary E Thompson; Gerard Hastings Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Pedro Marques-Vidal; João Melich-Cerveira; Fred Paccaud; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider; Jacques Cornuz Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Annice E Kim; James M Nonnemaker; Brett R Loomis; Paul R Shafer; Asma Shaikh; Edward Hill; John W Holloway; Matthew C Farrelly Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anne C Grunseit; Eloise Howse; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Jo Mitchell; Adrian E Bauman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dirk-Jan A van Mourik; Math J J M Candel; Gera E Nagelhout; Marc C Willemsen; Geoffrey T Fong; Karin Hummel; Bas van den Putte; Hein de Vries Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ariel Bardach; Andrea Alcaraz; Javier Roberti; Agustín Ciapponi; Federico Augustovski; Andrés Pichon-Riviere Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 3.390