Literature DB >> 23076548

What is needed to deliver collaborative care to address comorbidity more effectively for adults with a severe mental illness?

Stuart J Lee1, Elizabeth Crowther, Charlotte Keating, Jayashri Kulkarni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Innovative models of care for people with a severe mental illness have been developed across Australia to more effectively address comorbidity and disability by enhancing the collaboration between clinical and non-clinical services. In particular, this review paper focuses on collaboration that has occurred to address comorbidities affecting the following domains: homelessness; substance addiction; physical ill-health; unemployment; and forensic issues.
METHOD: The identification of relevant collaborative care models was facilitated by carrying out a review of the published peer-reviewed literature and policy or other published reports available on the Internet. Contact was also made with representatives of the mental health branches of each Australian state and territory health department to assist in identifying examples of innovative collaborative care models established within their jurisdiction.
RESULTS: A number of nationally implemented and local examples of collaborative care models were identified that have successfully delivered enhanced integration of care between clinical and non-clinical services. Several key principles for effective collaboration were also identified. Governmental and organisational promotion of and incentives for cross-sector collaboration is needed along with education for staff about comorbidity and the capacity of cross-sector agencies to work in collaboration to support shared clients. Enhanced communication has been achieved through mechanisms such as the co-location of staff from different agencies to enhance sharing of expertise and interagency continuity of care, shared treatment plans and client records, and shared case review meetings. Promoting a 'housing first approach' with cross-sector services collaborating to stabilise housing as the basis for sustained clinical engagement has also been successful.
CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sector collaboration is achievable and can result in significant benefits for mental health consumers and staff of collaborating services. Expanding the availability of collaborative care across Australia is therefore a priority for achieving a more holistic, socially inclusive, and effective mental health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076548     DOI: 10.1177/0004867412463975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  10 in total

1.  Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams.

Authors:  Kristin Trane; Kristian Aasbrenn; Martin Rønningen; Sigrun Odden; Annika Lexén; Anne Landheim
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.913

2.  Exploring the impact of common assessment instrumentation on communication and collaboration in inpatient and community-based mental health settings: a focus group study.

Authors:  Lynn Martin; John P Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Characteristics of individuals presenting to treatment for primary alcohol problems versus other drug problems in the Australian patient pathways study.

Authors:  Dan I Lubman; Joshua B B Garfield; Victoria Manning; Lynda Berends; David Best; Janette M Mugavin; Tina Lam; Penny Buykx; Andrew Larner; Belinda Lloyd; Robin Room; Steve Allsop
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Intersectoral policy for severe and persistent mental illness: review of approaches in a sample of high-income countries.

Authors:  S Diminic; G Carstensen; M G Harris; N Reavley; J Pirkis; C Meurk; I Wong; B Bassilios; H A Whiteford
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 5.  Strategies to facilitate integrated care for people with alcohol and other drug problems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Savic; David Best; Victoria Manning; Dan I Lubman
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  Flexible assertive community treatment teams can change complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of service providers.

Authors:  Kristin Trane; Kristian Aasbrenn; Martin Rønningen; Sigrun Odden; Annika Lexén; Anne Landheim
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-04-23

7.  Deployment of the consultation-liaison model in adult and child-adolescent psychiatry and its impact on improving mental health treatment.

Authors:  M-J Fleury; G Grenier; L Gentil; P Roberge
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Predictors of Recurrent High Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Lia Gentil; Guy Grenier; Helen-Maria Vasiliadis; Christophe Huỳnh; Marie-Josée Fleury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Impact of Electronic Health Records on Information Practices in Mental Health Contexts: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Timothy Charles Kariotis; Megan Prictor; Shanton Chang; Kathleen Gray
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.076

10.  Cross-sector Service Provision in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Shannon Winters; Lilian Magalhaes; Elizabeth Anne Kinsella; Anita Kothari
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.120

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.