Literature DB >> 23076358

Competition between glutathione and DNA oligonucleotides for ruthenium(II) arene anticancer complexes.

Fuyi Wang1, Jingjing Xu, Kui Wu, Stefan K Weidt, C Logan Mackay, Pat R R Langridge-Smith, Peter J Sadler.   

Abstract

The organometallic anticancer complex [(η(6)-bip)Ru(en)Cl](+) (1; bip = biphenyl, en = ethylenediamine) selectively binds to N7 of guanine bases of oligonucleotides and native DNA. However, under physiologically relevant conditions (micromolar Ru concentrations, pH 7, 22 mM NaCl, 310 K), the tripeptide glutathione (γ-L-Glu-L-Cys-Gly; GSH) is kinetically competitive with guanine (as guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate, cGMP) for coordination with complex 1, and gives rise to a ruthenium thiolato adduct. This thiolato adduct can subsequently undergo oxidation to a sulfenate intermediate, providing a facile route for the formation of a final cGMP adduct via the displacement of S-bound glutathione by G N7 (F. Y. Wang, J. J. Xu, A. Habtemariam, J. Bella and P. J. Sadler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17734). In this work, the competition between GSH and the single-stranded 14-mer oligonucleotide 5'-TATGTACCATGTAT-3' (I) and duplex III (III = I + II, II = 5'-ATACATGGTACATA) for complex 1 and its analogue [(η(6)-tha)Ru(en)Cl](+) (2, tha = tetrahydroanthracene) under physiologically relevant conditions was investigated using conventional ESI-MS and high resolution ESI-FTICR-MS coupled to conventional HPLC and nanoscale HPLC, respectively. The results indicate that whether there was high excess of GSH or not in the reaction mixtures, the reaction of complex 1 or 2 with single-stranded oligonucleotide I always gave rise to mono-ruthenated oligonucleotide, and the reaction of complex 1 or 2 with duplex III gave rise to the mono-ruthenated duplex oligonucleotide. Furthermore, the ruthenation of duplex III by complex 1 showed no significant discrimination between the complementary strands I and II, but complex 2 appeared to bind preferentially to strand II compared to strand I as revealed by the high resolution FTICR-MS analysis. GSH is highly abundant in cells at millimolar concentrations and is well known to be involved in the deactivation of the clinical drug cisplatin and in platinum resistance. Our findings reveal a potentially contrasting role for GSH in the mechanism of action of these ruthenium anticancer complexes that may contribute to the lack of cross-resistance with platinum drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076358     DOI: 10.1039/c2dt32091f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dalton Trans        ISSN: 1477-9226            Impact factor:   4.390


  4 in total

1.  Anticancer and antimicrobial properties of novel η6-p-cymene ruthenium(ii) complexes containing a N,S-type ligand, their structural and theoretical characterization.

Authors:  Ewelina Namiecińska; Beata Sadowska; Marzena Więckowska-Szakiel; Anna Dołęga; Beata Pasternak; Magdalena Grazul; Elzbieta Budzisz
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Synthesis, Characterisation and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Catalytically Active Indole-Based Half-Sandwich Complexes.

Authors:  Joan J Soldevila-Barreda; Kehinde B Fawibe; Maria Azmanova; Laia Rafols; Anaïs Pitto-Barry; Uche B Eke; Nicolas P E Barry
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Transfer hydrogenation catalysis in cells as a new approach to anticancer drug design.

Authors:  Joan J Soldevila-Barreda; Isolda Romero-Canelón; Abraha Habtemariam; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Antitumor Activity of Ruthenium(II) Terpyridine Complexes towards Colon Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Maja Savic; Aleksandar Arsenijevic; Jelena Milovanovic; Bojana Stojanovic; Vesna Stankovic; Ana Rilak Simovic; Dejan Lazic; Nebojsa Arsenijevic; Marija Milovanovic
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.