AIM: Surgical access to the condyle in panfacial fractures is a delicate and debated issue. The aim of the study was to propose a protocol which would apply in the treatment of panfacial fractures requiring access to the condyles. METHODS: A case series of 10 patients (8 males and 2 females) with panfacial fractures consisting of 16 extracapsular mandibular condylar fractures associated with 3 symphyseal, 7 parasymphyseal, 1 mandibular angle, 6 Le Fort II, 3 orbitomaxillomalar, 5 zygomatic arch fractures were included in this study. Reduction and fixation were achieved using the mini-retromandibular access in 6 patients with 10 extracapsular condylar fractures while in 4 patients with 6 extracapsular condylar fractures access to the condyles consisted in a face-lift-type preauricular access, as a caudal extension of a coronal or hemicoronal incision required for the reduction and fixation of other fractures of the upper and middle thirds. RESULTS: A good morphological and functional outcome was achieved in all patients. No surgical complication associated with access to the condyles or treatment of the condylar fractures was registered. CONCLUSION: The proposed protocol could be used as a guide in choosing access to the condyles in panfacial traumas.
AIM: Surgical access to the condyle in panfacial fractures is a delicate and debated issue. The aim of the study was to propose a protocol which would apply in the treatment of panfacial fractures requiring access to the condyles. METHODS: A case series of 10 patients (8 males and 2 females) with panfacial fractures consisting of 16 extracapsular mandibular condylar fractures associated with 3 symphyseal, 7 parasymphyseal, 1 mandibular angle, 6 Le Fort II, 3 orbitomaxillomalar, 5 zygomatic arch fractures were included in this study. Reduction and fixation were achieved using the mini-retromandibular access in 6 patients with 10 extracapsular condylar fractures while in 4 patients with 6 extracapsular condylar fractures access to the condyles consisted in a face-lift-type preauricular access, as a caudal extension of a coronal or hemicoronal incision required for the reduction and fixation of other fractures of the upper and middle thirds. RESULTS: A good morphological and functional outcome was achieved in all patients. No surgical complication associated with access to the condyles or treatment of the condylar fractures was registered. CONCLUSION: The proposed protocol could be used as a guide in choosing access to the condyles in panfacial traumas.