Literature DB >> 23075526

Secondary eyes mediate the response to looming objects in jumping spiders (Phidippus audax, Salticidae).

Lauren Spano1, Skye M Long, Elizabeth M Jakob.   

Abstract

Some species have sensory systems divided into subsystems with morphologically different sense organs that acquire different types of information within the same modality. Jumping spiders (family Salticidae) have eight eyes. Four eyes are directed anteriorly to view objects in front of the spider: a pair of principal eyes track targets with their movable retinae, while the immobile anterior lateral (AL) eyes have a larger field of view and lower resolution. To test whether the principal eyes, the AL eyes, or both together mediate the response to looming stimuli, we presented spiders with a video of a solid black circle that rapidly expanded (loomed) or contracted (receded). Control spiders and spiders with their principal eyes masked were significantly more likely to back away from the looming stimulus than were spiders with their AL eyes masked. Almost no individuals backed away from the receding stimulus. Our results show that the AL eyes alone mediate the loom response to objects anterior to the spider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23075526      PMCID: PMC3497142          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

1.  Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders.

Authors:  Susan E Masta; Wayne P Maddison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Escape behaviors in insects.

Authors:  Gwyneth M Card
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Depth perception from image defocus in a jumping spider.

Authors:  Takashi Nagata; Mitsumasa Koyanagi; Hisao Tsukamoto; Shinjiro Saeki; Kunio Isono; Yoshinori Shichida; Fumio Tokunaga; Michiyo Kinoshita; Kentaro Arikawa; Akihisa Terakita
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Collision detection as a model for sensory-motor integration.

Authors:  Haleh Fotowat; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  Hideki Nakagawa; Kang Hongjian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hyperacute motion detection by the lateral eyes of jumping spiders.

Authors:  Daniel B Zurek; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Infant responses to impending collision: optical and real.

Authors:  W Ball; E Tronick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli.

Authors:  M F Land
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Structure of the retinae of the principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics.

Authors:  M F Land
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biogeography and eye size evolution of the ogre-faced spiders.

Authors:  Lisa Chamberland; Ingi Agnarsson; Iris L Quayle; Tess Ruddy; James Starrett; Jason E Bond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Innate pattern recognition and categorization in a jumping spider.

Authors:  Yinnon Dolev; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.