Literature DB >> 23075438

Soft tissue artifact in canine kinematic gait analysis.

Monique Schwencke1, Luc A Smolders, Niklas Bergknut, Pia Gustås, Bjorn P Meij, Herman A Hazewinkel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, noninvasively, the soft tissue artifact (STA) in canine kinematic gait analysis. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Labrador retrievers (n = 4).
METHODS: Kinematic study: Reflective markers were glued to the skin over bony landmarks, with the distance between 2 markers representing the length of the underlying scapula, humerus, ulna, femur, and crus. The distance between these markers (marker distance [MD]) was measured with infrared cameras while the dogs stood still or walked on a treadmill. Fluoroscopy study: Radiopaque markers were glued on the skin over the spinous process of the L6 vertebra and the stifle to allow fluoroscopic observation of the markers and underlying skeletal segments while the dogs walked on the treadmill. The position of the markers was compared with the position of the underlying skeletal segments during different phases of the step cycle.
RESULTS: Kinematic study: Significant differences were found between MD during standing and walking for all bones investigated. Mean percentage differences in MD ranged from -18% to +6%. Fluoroscopy study: Significant displacements relative to the bony landmarks were found ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the motion of skeletal structures with the use of markers attached to the skin showed that the skin moves relative to underlying skeletal structures. When working with a 3-D motion-capture system using skin markers, researchers should be aware that the STA could significantly influence their results. © Copyright 2012 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23075438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01021.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of skeletal kinematics in freely moving rodents.

Authors:  Arne Monsees; Kay-Michael Voit; Damian J Wallace; Juergen Sawinski; Edyta Charyasz; Klaus Scheffler; Jakob H Macke; Jason N D Kerr
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 47.990

2.  Comparative kinematic gait analysis in young and old Beagle dogs.

Authors:  Malin Lorke; Maray Willen; Karin Lucas; Martin Beyerbach; Patrick Wefstaedt; Hugo Murua Escobar; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.672

3.  Kinetic and kinematic follow-up gait analysis in Doberman Pinschers with cervical spondylomyelopathy treated medically and surgically.

Authors:  Kari D Foss; Rebecca L Smith; Ronaldo C da Costa
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Description of soft tissue artifacts and related consequences on hindlimb kinematics during canine gait.

Authors:  Cheng-Chung Lin; Shi-Nuan Wang; Ming Lu; Tzu-Yi Chao; Tung-Wu Lu; Ching-Ho Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Quantification of three-dimensional soft tissue artifacts in the canine hindlimb during passive stifle motion.

Authors:  Cheng-Chung Lin; Chia-Lin Chang; Ming Lu; Tung-Wu Lu; Ching-Ho Wu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Effect of Limb Position at the Time of Skin Marker Application on Sagittal Plane Kinematics of the Dog.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Bryan T Torres; Gabriella S Sandberg; Steven C Budsberg
Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.358

7.  Functional assessment of the gluteus medius, cranial part of the biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis in Beagle dogs based on a novel gait phase classification.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Yoshikawa; Sae Tsubakishita; Tadashi Sano; Takumi Ino; Tomoya Miyasaka; Takio Kitazawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 1.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.