Literature DB >> 23074561

Role of surgeon in length of stay in ICU after cardiac bypass surgery.

Mahdi Najafi1, Hamidreza Goodarzynejad, Mahmood Sheikhfathollahi, Hossein Adibi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We presumed that the surgeon himself has an impact on the results after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as there is no unique protocol for the discharge of post-operative cardiac patients at our institution. Therefore, we examined whether the surgeon himself has an impact on the intensive care unit (ICU) stay of isolated CABG patients.
METHODS: We prospectively studied a total of 570 consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG. Length of stay in the ICU was defined as the number of days in the ICU unit post-operatively. Seven operating surgeons were classified in 3 categories on the basis of the mean hospital stay of their patients (1, 2 and 3 if the mean total patients' stay in hospital was <8 days, between 8 to 10 days, and longer than 10 days; respectively). Using a multivariable regression model, we determined the independent predictors of length of stay in the ICU (> 48 hours) and examined the role of surgeon in this regard.
RESULTS: Incidence of post-operative arrhythmia and length of ICU stay were higher in the patients of surgeon category 3 than those of surgeon categories 1 and 2. Surgeon category 3 also operated on patients with higher EuroSCOREs than did surgeon categories 1 and 2. With the aid of a multivariable stepwise analysis, three variables were identified as independent predictors significantly associated with ICU length of stay: age, history of cerebrovascular accident, and surgeon category.
CONCLUSION: Surgeon category may independently predict a prolonged length of stay in the ICU. We suggest that a unique discharge protocol for post-CABG patients be considered to restrict the role of surgeon in the ICU stay of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery bypass; Intensive care units; Length of stay

Year:  2010        PMID: 23074561      PMCID: PMC3466845     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent        ISSN: 1735-5370


Introduction

Despite major improvements in peri-operative management, a remarkable proportion of cardiac surgery patients are monitored in the intensive care unit (ICU) for a period of time longer than usual recovery period.1 A prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the ICU following cardiac surgery is linked with poor patient outcomes and possibly restricts the overall number of performed procedures.2 Prolonged hospitalization also considerably increases the expenditure of health resources.3, 4 Thus, to improve care efficiency, institutions often need to identify patients that possibly need a longer period of high dependency care after cardiac surgery. Among cardiac surgeries, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has received particular attention in this regard because it is an expensive and commonly performed procedure.4, 5 Furthermore, increased ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients has been related to a significant reduction in long-term survival;6 therefore, the ability to precisely predict the duration of stay in the ICU and patient outcome is of essential importance. Many studies have reported the factors affecting the length of post-operative ICU stay, but since a large number of variables could be considered,7 disparity in study results exists. Moreover, there is not a unique protocol for discharging the post-operative patients at our institution, so we presumed that surgeon himself has an impact on the results after CABG surgery as well as on the ICU stay and costs. We, therefore, undertook this prospective study to determine pre-operative and intra-operative predictors contributing to prolonged LOS in the ICU with a special focus on the role of individual surgeons in influencing surgery outcomes.

Methods

From May to September 2006, we prospectively studied a total of 570 consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG at Tehran Heart Center. Patients who underwent CABG combined with a heart valve repair or replacement, resection of a ventricular aneurysm, or other surgical procedures were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients, and the study was approved by the local hospital ethics committee. Patient data, risk factors, operation, and outcome data were prospectively recorded on a structured paper form as described previously.8 Briefly, during the patient’s admission by interview and physical examination the following variables were collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class, the number of diseased vessels, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). History of myocardial infarction, smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory failure, and renal failure were also noted. Pre-operative medical characteristics were collected by research general practitioners, and operation data were detailed by the surgeons and perfusionists. The data were entered into the SPSS software by a single operator at a later date. LOS in the ICU was defined as the number of days in the ICU unit post-operatively. Patients who stayed in the ICU for more than 2 consecutive days on the initial admission were classified as having a prolonged ICU stay. The study outcomes were the pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors of prolonged LOS in the ICU, and the occurrence of post-operative complications in the ICU. Patients who currently smoked cigarettes or who had quit smoking for less than 1 month were considered smokers. Any cerebral neurological deficit induced by both cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and transient ischemic attacks or previous cerebral surgery was defined as cerebrovascular disease. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was defined as history or any evidence of aneurysm or occlusive peripheral vascular disease on physical examination. The amount of inotropic support and arterial blood gas parameters (base excess and pH in plasma) were recorded within and up to 24 hours after surgery. A wound infection was any wound infection in the sternum or leg incision following surgery. Post-operative arrhythmia was defined as all observed rhythms except for normal sinus rhythm. The operations were performed by seven surgeons. Surgeons, in terms of mean total in-hospital duration of stay for patients of each individual surgeon, were classified into 3 groups as follows: 1, if mean total patients’ stay in hospital was <8 days; 2, if mean total patients’ stay in hospital ranged between 8 to 10 days; and 3, if mean total patients’ stay in hospital was longer than 10 days. The numerical variables were presented as mean±SD and were compared using the One-Way ANOVA test, while the categorized variables were summarized by absolute frequencies and percentages and were compared using the chi-square test. A multivariable stepwise logistic regression models for risk factors predicting LOS in ICU was constructed. Variables were included into the multivariable model if the p value was found to be less than or equal to 0.20 in the univariable analysis as well as their clinical significance. The associations of the independent predictors of LOS in ICU in the final model were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Model discrimination was measured using the c statistic, which is equal to the area under the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve. Model calibration was estimated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit statistic (higher p values imply that the model fit the observed data better). For the statistical analysis, the statistical software SPSS version 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and the statistical package SAS version 9.1 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) were used. All the p values were 2-tailed, with statistical significance considered as p value ≤ 0.05.

Results

The baseline characteristics and pre-operative data of the CABG patients according to individual surgeon categories are presented in Table 1. There were 7 operating surgeons classified in 3 categories on the basis of the mean hospital stay of their patients as explained in the method section.
Table 1.

Pre-operative risk factors and operative characteristics of patients for individual surgeon categories

Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
p value
Number of patients320 (56.1)145 (25.4)105 (18.5)-
Age (y)59.23±8.9258.04±8.8659.80±9.220.260
Male246 (76.9)115 (79.3)68 (64.8)0.019
Body mass index (Kg/m2)27.33±4.1327.40±3.8127.51±4.280.924
Creatinine (mg/dl)1.27±0.281.24±0.231.26±0.300.517
LVEF (%)48.22±10.1248.57±11.0549.34±10.140.627
EuroSCORE2.19±0.112.28±0.183.06±0.250.002
Cardiac risk factors
  Diabetes125 (39.1)60 (41.4)48 (45.7)0.480
  Hypertension156 (48.8)72 (49.7)54 (51.4)0.892
  Hyperlipidemia229 (71.6)96 (66.2)75 (71.4)0.481
  Cigarette smoking110 (34.4)61 (42.1)35 (33.3)0.223
  Family history of CAD146 (45.6)68 (46.9)56 (53.3)0.386
Prior MI155 (48.9)80 (55.2)52 (49.5)0.443
Prior CVA10 (3.1)9 (6.2)3 (2.9)0.234
History of PVD78 (24.4)47 (32.4)33 (31.4)0.129
Number of grafts3.55±0.943.89±0.954.08±0.87<0.001
Inotropic drug use138 (43.1)49 (33.8)51 (48.6)0.049
IABP-support5 (1.6)6 (4.1)1 (1.0)0.133
Pump time (min)62.82±20.7074.54±20.0985.79±19.58<0.001
NYHA function class III–IV214 (66.9)88 (60.7)67 (63.8)0.423

Data are presented as n (%) or mean±SD

Category 1: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital < 8 days

Category 2: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital > 10 days

Category 3: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital 8–10 days

CAD, Coronary artery disease; MI, Myocardial infarction; CVA, Cerebrovascular accident; PVD, Peripheral vascular disease; IABP, Intra-aortic balloon pump; NYHA, New York heart association classification

Surgeon category 3 operated on patients with higher EuroSCOREs than did surgeon categories 1 and 2. There were also some differences noted between surgeon categories with respect to the number of grafts performed, inotropic drug use, and time on pump. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 0.5%. As seen in Table 2, all 3 deaths occurred in surgeon category 3 operations (2.9% compared to no mortality for patients in surgeon categories 1 and 2; p value = 0.001). Incidence of post-operative arrhythmia and length of ICU stay were higher in patients of surgeon category 3 than those of surgeon categories 1 and 2 (Table 2).
Table 2.

Patients’ mortality, outcome, and adverse events for individual surgeon categories

Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
p value
Mortality003 (2.9)0.001
Arrhythmia118 (36.9)52 (35.9)54 (51.4)0.018
Peri-operative MI2 (0.6)2 (1.4)00.422
Peri-operative CVA2 (0.6)1 (0.7)1 (1.0)0.941
Respiratory failure52 (16.3)29 (20.0)23 (21.9)0.351
Wound infection1 (0.3)2 (1.4)00.240
LOS in the ICU (hr)44.40±31.1945.02±38.0556.84±39.590.005
Arterial blood gas parameters
  Mean BE within 6 hours after surgery−5.78±2.57−5.35±2.33−5.84±2.900.198
  Mean pH < 7.34 within 6 hours after surgery78 (24.4)30 (20.7)25 (23.8)0.679

Data are presented as n (%) or mean±SD

Category 1: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital < 8 days

Category 2: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital > 10 days

Category 3: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital 8–10 days

MI, Myocardial infarction; CVA, Cerebrovascular accident; LOS, Length of stay; ICU, Intensive care unit; BE, Base excess

Age, sex, BMI, surgeon category, EuroSCORE, hypertension, diabetes, prior CVA, history of PVD, prior MI, NYHA function class, LVEF, number of diseased vessels, and creatinine were the variables entered into the logistic regression model based on their statistical significance in univariable analyses (entering criterion p value ≤ 0.20) as well as their clinical significance. Table 3 shows the independent predictors of LOS at ICU in patients undergoing CABG. The multivariable stepwise analysis helped identify three variables as independent predictors significantly associated with ICU length of stay: age, history of CVA, and surgeon category. The table also shows that the predictive performance of the risk model assessed by using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was acceptable (c = 0.64), and so was the calibration of the risk model.
Table 3.

Determinants of length of stay at intensive care unit

Predictors
OR
95% CI
P value
Surgeon category*0.017
  1**1--
  20.8310.537–1.288
  31.7291.097–2.725
Age1.0201.000–1.0410.048
Prior CVA2.5931.082–6.2150.027

Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: p value=0.86

Area under the ROC curve (AUC): c=0.64

Category 1: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital < 8 days

Category 2: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital > 10 days

Category 3: Mean total patient’s stay in hospital 8–10 days

Reference category

CVA, Cerebrovascular accident; OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval

Discussion

We studied pre-operative and intra-operative variables in a multivariable regression model to predict LOS in the ICU after bypass surgery for 570 CABG patients at our center. Three variables, namely age, prior CVA, and surgeon category, were found to be the independent predictors of an ICU length of stay greater than 48 hours. Over the past 2 decades, a considerable number of reports have been published on the predictors of LOS in ICU following CABG surgery. However, a great disparity in type and number of independent variables analyzed has been reported. Tuman et al.7 found 11 pre-operative variables to be significantly associated with LOS in the ICU, including emergency surgery, age, pre-operative renal dysfunction, prior MI, cerebrovascular disease, type of surgery, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular dysfunction. Although they developed a model for predicting illness after cardiac surgery, the study has been shown to predict only the mean LOS in the ICU. In a similar study on pre-operative variables, Tu et al.9 suggested that LOS following cardiac surgery could be predicted by a multivariate predictive index. Five variables were found to be the independent predictors of prolonged LOS in the ICU (age, female sex, left ventricular function, urgency of surgery, and type of surgery). Nonetheless, the authors accepted that the model had a poor predictive ability and LOS in the ICU could not be predicted with certainty. Mounsey et al.10 found only left ventricular end diastolic pressure and number of diseased coronary vessels to be beneficial in predicting LOS in ICU. Michalopoulos et al.11 studied elective procedures taking into account not only pre-operative variables, but also significant variables related to both the operative and immediate post-operative period such as number of inotropes administered and blood transfusion. They found that age, pre-operative left ventricular ejection fraction, bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, number of inotropic agents used, and blood transfusions to be predictors of an extended LOS in the ICU. Deoring et al.2 suggested that a significant portion of the variance in the ICU length of stay following CABG could be attributed to five variables, including pre-operative mortality risk (Parsonnet score), intubation hours, presence of arrhythmias, early hemodynamic instability, and 12-hour fluid balance. Finally, in a newly published study, Rosenfeld and co-workers12 found age > 70 years, urgency of surgery, pump time, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to be the independent pre-operative predictors for a prolonged ICU stay in CABG patients. Such disparity in study results may be due to the fact that the majority of these studies have not included the operative or immediate post-operative variables and have just taken into account events which affect patient outcome during the pre-operative period. Other explanations for the differences in study findings may be due to various study populations and treatment protocols, different cut-off used to define a prolonged stay in the ICU (from ≥ 2 to 10 days),9, 10, 13, 14 differences in variables definitions, and the large number of variables that can be considered.7 Chiming with other studies that have suggested age to be an independent predictor of the ICU stay ≥48 hours, ≥3 days, and ≥ 6 days,15–17 age was also a significant predictor of LOS in ICU in our study. A longer stay in the ICU in older patients may be justified by higher pre-operative co-morbidity rates and severity of illness.18–20 However, because of improvements in operative and anesthetic techniques, mortality and morbidity in the elderly have been declined in recent years.18, 19, 21 Gender was not a significant predictor in our study. In a recently published study, Ranucci et al.22 also reported that female gender was not an independent risk factor for mortality or prolonged ICU stay, which is consistent with our results. In a previous study,23 the variable of ‘previous history of CVA’ was independently associated with atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. It can be assumed that prior CVA may prolong LOS following CABG surgery by increasing the risk of atrial fibrillation arrhythmia as suggested by our current study. The main difference between our study and those described above is that we took into account surgeon category as a variable. We found that the surgeon could potentially influence the duration of a patient’s ICU stay and that there were differences in the average LOS in ICU between surgeons at our hospital. Particularly, we found that patients in surgeon category one as a reference, had higher LOS compared to category 2 and lower LOS compared to category 3. It may indicate the necessity of using a unique protocol for discharging post-operative patients. This study was observational and limited by its inherent restrictions and by the fact that we did not evaluate the contribution of individual intra-operative variables such as blood transfusion and cross-clamp time. However, it has previously been shown that compared with pre-operative and post-operative variables, intra-operative factors are less indicative of ICU duration of stay when all factors are considered together.10, 24 Moreover, as all our patients were elective, the conclusions are limited to this study population and do not include emergent patients.

Conclusion

Detection of high-risk patients may help in more careful peri-operative management to decrease the possibility of prolonged hospitalization and its related morbidity and mortality. More studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to identify other factors contributing to ICU stay in CABG which have not been studied to date. In addition to age and other pre-operative variables, surgeon category may predict an extended LOS in the ICU. We suggest that a unique protocol for discharging post-operative patients be considered to restrict the role of surgeon in ICU stay after bypass surgery.
  24 in total

1.  Severe morbidity after coronary artery surgery: development and validation of a simple predictive clinical score.

Authors:  P Staat; M Cucherat; M George; J J Lehot; O Jegaden; X André-Fouët; J Beaune
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Identification of risk factors for increased cost, charges, and length of stay for cardiac patients.

Authors:  S MaWhinney; E R Brown; J Malcolm; C VillaNueva; B M Groves; R A Quaife; J Lindenfeld; B A Warner; K E Hammermeister; F L Grover; A L Shroyer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Morbidity and duration of ICU stay after cardiac surgery. A model for preoperative risk assessment.

Authors:  K J Tuman; R J McCarthy; R J March; H Najafi; A D Ivankovich
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Predictors of quality of life among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Mahdi Najafi; Mehrdad Sheikhvatan; Ali Montazeri; Mahmood Sheikhfathollahi
Journal:  Acta Cardiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  1992 hospital charges for two major surgical procedures for cardiovascular diseases. Part I: Coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar

6.  Perioperative predictors of ICU and hospital costs in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  L V Doering; F Esmailian; H Laks
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  A predictive index for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J V Tu; C D Mazer; C Levinton; P W Armstrong; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: risk factors and their temporal relationship in prophylactic drug strategy decision.

Authors:  Giovanni Mariscalco; Karl Gunnar Engström
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.

Authors:  J V Tu; S B Jaglal; C D Naylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Determinants of the length of stay in intensive care and in hospital after coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  J P Mounsey; M J Griffith; D W Heaviside; A H Brown; D S Reid
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Discriminative Power of EuroSCORE in Predicting Morbidity and Prolonged Hospital Stay in an Iranian Sample Population.

Authors:  Mahdi Najafi; Mehrdad Sheikhvatan; Mahmood Sheikhfathollahi
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2014-01-12

Review 2.  Systematic review of factors influencing length of stay in ICU after adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Almashrafi; Mustafa Elmontsri; Paul Aylin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Determinants of length of stay in surgical ward after coronary bypass surgery: glycosylated hemoglobin as a predictor in all patients, diabetic or non-diabetic.

Authors:  Mahdi Najafi; Hamidreza Goodarzynejad
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2012-11-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.