Literature DB >> 2307442

Perceptions of the autopsy: views from the lay public and program proposals.

H G Brown1.   

Abstract

The autopsy has historically served as a critical research and teaching tool in medicine as well as a means to ensure control over the quality of health care. In recent years, however, the autopsy has lost favor among the public and fallen into disuse within the medical community. This paper offers some insights into the reasons behind the decline of the autopsy as viewed by the lay public. Programs to help revitalize use of the autopsy are suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2307442     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90123-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  9 in total

1.  Necropsy request practices in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; C T Escoffery; S E Shirley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Asking relatives for permission for a post mortem examination.

Authors:  S J Sherwood; R D Start
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  A survey of general practitioners' views on autopsy reports.

Authors:  S Karunaratne; E W Benbow
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Public perceptions of necropsy.

Authors:  R D Start; C A Saul; D W Cotton; N J Mathers; J C Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Factors which influence necropsy requests: a psychological approach.

Authors:  R D Start; M J Hector-Taylor; D W Cotton; M Startup; M A Parsons; A Kennedy
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Post-mortem tissue biopsies obtained at minimally invasive autopsy: an RNA-quality analysis.

Authors:  Anita van der Linden; Britt M Blokker; Marcel Kap; Annick C Weustink; Jan L Robertus; Peter H J Riegman; J Wolter Oosterhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Annick C Weustink; M G Myriam Hunink; J Wolter Oosterhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Autopsy rates in the Netherlands: 35 years of decline.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Annick C Weustink; M G Myriam Hunink; J Wolter Oosterhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.