| Literature DB >> 23074378 |
Michal Mego1, Hui Gao, Bang-Ning Lee, Evan N Cohen, Sanda Tin, Antonio Giordano, Qiong Wu, Ping Liu, Yago Nieto, Richard E Champlin, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Massimo Cristofanilli, Naoto T Ueno, James M Reuben.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated by conventional dose chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the role of CTCs and CTCs undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metastatic breast cancer. We used the platform of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) to study the CTCs and CTCs with EMT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTCs were enumerated in 21 MBC patients before apheresis and 1 month after AHSCT. CD34-depleted apheresis products were analyzed for CD326+ epithelial and Aldefluor+ cancer stem cells (CSC) by flow cytometry and were depleted of CD45+ cells and assessed for EMT-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TF) by quantitative RT-PCR.Entities:
Keywords: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.; circulating tumor cells; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; high-dose chemotherapy; metastatic breast cancer
Year: 2012 PMID: 23074378 PMCID: PMC3471078 DOI: 10.7150/jca.5111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Patient characteristics
| Variable | No. of patients (n = 21) | % |
|---|---|---|
| 44 years (30-60 years) | ||
| Infiltrative ductal carcinoma | 18 | 85.7 |
| Other | 3 | 14.3 |
| 11 | 52.4 | |
| Positive for either | 14 | 66.7 |
| Negative for both | 7 | 33.3 |
| Positive | 5 | 23.8 |
| Negative | 15 | 71.4 |
| Unknown | 1 | 4.8 |
| 6 | 28.6 | |
| 12 | 57.1 | |
| 4 | 19.0 | |
| 6 | 28.6 | |
| 9 | 42.9 | |
| Before mobilization | 3 | 14.3 |
| 1 month after AHSCT | 2 | 9.5 |
Abbreviations: ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HDCT, high-dose chemotherapy; AHSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CTC, circulating tumor cell; PB, peripheral blood.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival of patients treated with HDCT and AHSCT
| Variable | No. of patients | No. of relapses | HR | 95% CI for HR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 13 | 1.05 | 0.98-1.13 | 0.15 | |
| Positive for either | 14 | 7 | 0.60 | 0.19-1.89 | 0.38 |
| Negative for both | 7 | 5 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Negative | 15 | 10 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Positive | 5 | 2 | 0.39 | 0.09-1.79 | 0.23 |
| 1 or 2 | 6 | 3 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| 3 | 11 | 8 | 1.91 | 0.50-7.22 | 0.34 |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.10-9.66 | 0.99 |
| 6 | 3 | 1.00 | --- | --- | |
| 15 | 10 | 1.24 | 0.34-4.52 | 0.75 | |
| Complete remission | 6 | 3 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Not complete remission | 14 | 9 | 1.61 | 0.43-5.98 | 0.48 |
| Complete remission | 9 | 4 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Not complete remission | 12 | 9 | 4.16 | 1.19-14.60 | 0.03 |
| < 5 | 18 | 11 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| ≥ 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.40 | 0.65-17.85 | 0.15 |
| < 5 | 19 | 11 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| ≥ 5 | 2 | 2 | 8.91 | 1.46-54.26 | 0.02 |
| Low | 10 | 4 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| High | 10 | 8 | 3.30 | 0.96-11.29 | 0.06 |
| No | 15 | 9 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 4 | 4 | 2.92 | 0.82-10.43 | 0.10 |
| No | 14 | 8 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 5 | 5 | 2.50 | 0.79-7.94 | 0.12 |
| No | 11 | 5 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 8 | 8 | 4.29 | 1.26-14.59 | 0.02 |
| 18 | 11 | 1.32 | 0.81-2.14 | 0.26 |
Abbreviations: HDCT, high-dose chemotherapy; AHSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; CTC, circulating tumor cells; PB, peripheral blood.
*The median percentage of CD326+ epithelial cells in CD34-depleted aphaeresis products was 0.03%. This value was used as a cut-off to classify patients as CD326+CD45dim high or CD326+CD45dim low.
**Overexpression was defined as at least twice the expression observed in the CD45-depleted fraction.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in patients treated with HDCT and AHSCT.
| Variable | No. of patients | Deaths | HR | 95% CI for HR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 7 | 1.08 | 0.98-1.18 | 0.11 | |
| Positive for either | 14 | 4 | 0.99 | 0.18-5.51 | 0.99 |
| Negative for both | 7 | 2 | 1.00 | --- | |
| Negative | 15 | 6 | NA | NA | NA |
| Positive | 5 | 0 | NA | NA | NA |
| 1 or 2 | 6 | 2 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| 3 | 11 | 3 | 0.81 | 0.13-4.91 | 0.82 |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1.86 | 0.17-20.64 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 1 | 1.00 | --- | --- | |
| 15 | 6 | 2.24 | 0.27-18.65 | 0.46 | |
| Complete remission | 6 | 0 | NA | NA | NA |
| Not complete remission | 14 | 6 | NA | NA | NA |
| Complete remission | 9 | 0 | NA | NA | NA |
| Not complete remission | 12 | 7 | NA | NA | NA |
| < 5 | 18 | 5 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| ≥ 5 | 3 | 2 | 5.93 | 0.96-36.76 | 0.06 |
| < 5 | 19 | 5 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| ≥ 5 | 2 | 2 | 8.37 | 1.38-50.88 | 0.02 |
| low | 10 | 2 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| high | 10 | 4 | 2.64 | 0.47-14.89 | 0.27 |
| No | 15 | 5 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 4 | 2 | 2.48 | 0.44-13.99 | 0.30 |
| No | 14 | 4 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 5 | 3 | 1.75 | 0.39-7.85 | 0.47 |
| No | 11 | 3 | 1.00 | --- | --- |
| Yes | 8 | 4 | 2.10 | 0.46-9.55 | 0.34 |
| 18 | 6 | 1.78 | 0.99-3.18 | 0.05 |
Abbreviations: HDCT, high-dose chemotherapy; AHSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; CTC, circulating tumor cells; PB, peripheral blood.
*The median percentage of CD326+ epithelial cells in CD34-depleted aphaeresis products was 0.03%. This value was used as a cut-off to classify patients as CD326+CD45- high or CD326+CD45- low.
**Overexpression was defined as at least twice the expression observed in the CD45-depleted fraction.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (A, B) and overall survival (C, D) according to the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC).
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival according to the percentage of CD326+ epithelial cells (A) and overexpression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TF) TWIST1 and SNAIL1 (B).
Figure 3A. Patients with a complete response (CR) had a significantly lower percentage of Aldefluor+ cells than patients without a CR. B. Patients with TWIST1-high tumors had a significantly higher percentage of breast cancer stem cells (Aldefluor+ CSC) than patients with TWIST1-low tumors.