PURPOSE: Plantar plate injuries have been identified as a cause of forefoot pain and deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) have been suggested as appropriate imaging modalities for this pathology. A comparison of these two modalities utilizing intra-operatively pathology as the reference standard has not been published. METHODOLOGY: 51 feet of 42 consecutive patients presenting to clinic with forefoot pain and a suspected unilateral plantar plate tear at the 2nd metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint were identified. A two plane (longitudinal and transverse) US was performed on the painful second MTP joint. Longitudinal ultrasound images were graded as 'torn' or 'intact'. Transverse ultrasound images were used to localize pathology. All ultrasound exams were performed by the same reconstructive foot & ankle fellow. A pre-operative MRI was performed on these patients and read by a Fellowship Trained Musculoskeletal Radiologist. The physicians reading US and the MRI were blinded to each other's findings. RESULTS: All 51 feet were examined intra-operatively. 46 plantar plate tears were identified. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative value of MRI were 73.9%, 100%, 100%, 29.4% respectively while the same values for US were 91.5%, 25%, 91.5%, 25% respectively. MRI identified 4 collateral ligaments tears not identified on ultrasound. Discussion & CONCLUSIONS: Both MRI and US are appropriate modalities for imaging of the plantar plate. While US is a highly sensitive exam, MRI is a more specific exam. Overall these results do not suggest that MR should be replaced by US in all cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level I.
PURPOSE: Plantar plate injuries have been identified as a cause of forefoot pain and deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) have been suggested as appropriate imaging modalities for this pathology. A comparison of these two modalities utilizing intra-operatively pathology as the reference standard has not been published. METHODOLOGY: 51 feet of 42 consecutive patients presenting to clinic with forefoot pain and a suspected unilateral plantar plate tear at the 2nd metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint were identified. A two plane (longitudinal and transverse) US was performed on the painful second MTP joint. Longitudinal ultrasound images were graded as 'torn' or 'intact'. Transverse ultrasound images were used to localize pathology. All ultrasound exams were performed by the same reconstructive foot & ankle fellow. A pre-operative MRI was performed on these patients and read by a Fellowship Trained Musculoskeletal Radiologist. The physicians reading US and the MRI were blinded to each other's findings. RESULTS: All 51 feet were examined intra-operatively. 46 plantar plate tears were identified. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative value of MRI were 73.9%, 100%, 100%, 29.4% respectively while the same values for US were 91.5%, 25%, 91.5%, 25% respectively. MRI identified 4 collateral ligaments tears not identified on ultrasound. Discussion & CONCLUSIONS: Both MRI and US are appropriate modalities for imaging of the plantar plate. While US is a highly sensitive exam, MRI is a more specific exam. Overall these results do not suggest that MR should be replaced by US in all cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level I.
Authors: Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.315