Literature DB >> 23073624

Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review.

Gordon James Hendry1.   

Abstract

Peer-physical examination is a widely adopted and an integral component of the undergraduate curriculum for many health science programs. Unwillingness or perceived inability to participate in peer-physical examination classes may have a negative impact upon students' abilities to competently conduct physical examinations of patients in future as registered health professionals. A literature review on the perceptions and attitudes of peer-physical examination of the lower limb amongst medical and health science students was conducted to identify potential barriers to participation, and to review strategies to improve participation in classes designed to develop clinical examination skills. A pragmatic search strategy of the literature from PubMed and Google Scholar published prior to June 2012 yielded 23 relevant articles. All articles were concerned with the views of medical students' education and there were no articles explicitly addressing the role of peer-physical examination in health science disciplines. Several ethical issues were identified including feelings of coercion, embarrassment, and perceptions of a lack of consideration for cultural and religious beliefs. The available evidence suggests that barriers to participation may be overcome by implementing standard protocols concerned with obtaining informed written consent, adequate choice of peer-examiner, changing facilities and garment advice, and possible alternative learning methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073624     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-012-9418-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  7 in total

1.  A mixed methods study of student perceptions of using standardized patients for learning and evaluation.

Authors:  Edward M Giesbrecht; Pamela F Wener; Gisèle M Pereira
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-08-12

2.  Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-07-11

3.  Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender.

Authors:  Silas Taylor; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-11-23

Review 4.  Physical examination in undergraduate medical education in the field of general practice - a scoping review.

Authors:  Dirk Moßhammer; Joachim Graf; Stefanie Joos; Rebekka Hertkorn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  A Trauma-Informed Approach to Peer Physical Examination.

Authors:  Sadie Elisseou; Emily Adams; Maya Adler
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2022-08-30

6.  Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Fabrizio Consorti; Rosaria Mancuso; Annalisa Piccolo; Giacomo Consorti; Joseph Zurlo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course.

Authors:  Manuel Burggraf; Julia Kristin; Alexander Wegner; Sascha Beck; Stephanie Herbstreit; Marcel Dudda; Marcus Jäger; Max Daniel Kauther
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.