Literature DB >> 23073327

Clinical outcome of atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed on an endometrial biopsy: institutional experience and review of literature.

Emad Rakha1, Siew Chee Wong, Irshad Soomro, Zia Chaudry, Aarti Sharma, Suha Deen, Stephen Chan, Jafaru Abu, David Nunns, Karin Williamson, Angus McGregor, Robert Hammond, Laurence Brown.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were: (1) to review the rate of concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH); and (2) to determine the features of concurrent endometrial carcinoma and their impact on the subsequent management of AEH. We reviewed a retrospective series of 219 AEHs diagnosed locally in routine practice, over 24 years, and followed by a repeat biopsy or hysterectomy. Another series of 65 cases with a malignant diagnosis on preoperative sampling was included as a control group. Clinicopathologic parameters were obtained. In addition, published data on the risk of malignancy and features of malignant tumors after a diagnosis of AEH were collected and analyzed. This study reported on 2571 patients diagnosed in 31 published studies in addition to the current one. This showed a wide variation in the positive predictive value (PPV) of AEH in detecting endometrial cancer (6% to 63%) with an overall PPV of 37%. This variation is not only based on the differences among studies but also on the degree of atypia [mild/moderate (PPV 13%) or severe (PPV 50%)], the type of subsequent intervention (biopsy vs. hysterectomy), and more importantly the time period of diagnosis (around 20% in studies published before 1990s and up to 40% to 48% in recently published cases). Of the benign outcome cases, nearly 40% to 50% showed AEH with a potential risk of progressing to invasive carcinoma in 25% of cases. Malignant tumors after AEH diagnosis are associated with features of good prognosis with endometrioid morphology, lower grade, and early stage. Although the overall PPV of AEH is 37%, a figure of 40% to 48% is expected in the cases currently diagnosed in routine practice. Providing qualifying criteria for AEH will help identify its different associated risks and therefore should be included in routine pathology reports whenever possible. Unless there is a clinical contraindication, hysterectomy should be performed to treat concurrent carcinoma and to reduce the risk of subsequent carcinoma in nonmalignant cases with residual AEH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073327     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31825dd4ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  10 in total

1.  Endometrial cancer arising from atypical complex hyperplasia: The significance in an endometrial biopsy and a diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Jung Mi Byun; Dae Hoon Jeong; Young Nam Kim; En Bee Cho; Ju Eun Cha; Moon Su Sung; Kyung Bok Lee; Ki Tae Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-11-16

2.  Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinical Model for Preoperatively Differentiating Concurrent Endometrial Carcinoma From Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Jieying Zhang; Qi Zhang; Tingting Wang; Yan Song; Xiaoduo Yu; Lizhi Xie; Yan Chen; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Prevalence of Co-existing Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients with Preoperative Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Pinar Kadirogullari; Cemal Resat Atalay; Ozhan Ozdemir; Mustafa Erkan Sari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Predictive diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and personalized therapeutic strategy in women of fertile age.

Authors:  Vadym M Goncharenko; Vasyl A Beniuk; Olga V Kalenska; Olga M Demchenko; Mykola Ya Spivak; Rostyslav V Bubnov
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle T Doherty; Omolara B Sanni; Helen G Coleman; Chris R Cardwell; W Glenn McCluggage; Declan Quinn; James Wylie; Úna C McMenamin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Fertility-Sparing Approaches in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nayanar-Adela Contreras; Jordi Sabadell; Paula Verdaguer; Carla Julià; Maria-Eulalia Fernández-Montolí
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Risk of atypical hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma after initial diagnosis of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Clara M Prip; Maria Stentebjerg; Mary H Bennetsen; Lone K Petersen; Pinar Bor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Endometrial hyperplasia as a risk factor of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lisa K Nees; Sabine Heublein; Sahra Steinmacher; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Sara Brucker; Clemens B Tempfer; Markus Wallwiener
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Menopausal Status Combined with Serum CA125 Level Significantly Predicted Concurrent Endometrial Cancer in Women Diagnosed with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia before Surgery .

Authors:  Yaochen Lou; Jiongbo Liao; Weiwei Shan; Zhiying Xu; Xiaojun Chen; Jun Guan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.