Literature DB >> 23072620

Global patterns of adverse drug reactions over a decade: analyses of spontaneous reports to VigiBase™.

Lise Aagaard1, Johanna Strandell, Lars Melskens, Paw S G Petersen, Ebba Holme Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although systems to collect information about suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were established in many countries and by the WHO in the 1960s, few studies have examined reported ADRs related to national income.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to characterize ADRs reported to the WHO-ADR database, VigiBase™, and to relate data to national income.
METHODS: We analysed ADR reports submitted to VigiBase™ from 2000 to 2009 with respect to reporting rate, age and sex of patient, type, seriousness and medications. Reports were also analysed with respect to national income level, classified in accordance with the World Bank definition: low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high.
RESULTS: We analysed 1,359,067 ADR reports including 3,013,074 ADRs. Overall, 16% of reports were serious and 60% were reported for females. High-income countries had the highest ADR reporting rates (range 3-613 reports/million inhabitants/year) and low-income countries the lowest (range 0-21). Distribution of ADRs across income groups with respect to age group, seriousness and sex was non-significant. Overall, the majority of ADRs were reported for nervous system medications, followed by cardiovascular medicines. Low-income countries reported relatively more ADRs for antiinfectives for systemic use than high-income countries, and high-income countries reported more ADRs for antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents than lower-income groups.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that high-income countries had the highest ADR reporting rates and low-income countries the lowest, with large variations across countries in each group. Significant differences in ADR reporting rates were only found for ADRs of the type 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' and for the therapeutic groups 'antiinfectives for systemic use' and 'antineoplastic and immunomodulation agents'. To strengthen ADR reporting rates, especially in low-income countries, more research is needed about the impact of organizational structures and economic resources of national pharmacovigilance centres and ADR reporting practices on the large variations in ADR reporting rates within income groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23072620     DOI: 10.1007/bf03262002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  19 in total

1.  Review of national spontaneous reporting schemes. Strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  M Louise Hughes; Cate M C Whittlesea; David K Luscombe
Journal:  Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Bruno H Ch Stricker; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

3.  US adverse drug reaction surveillance 1989-1994.

Authors:  G A Faich
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Establishing pharmacovigilance programs in resource-limited settings: the example of treating malaria.

Authors:  Ushma Mehta; Elizabeth Allen; Karen I Barnes
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.045

5.  Technology assessment of pharmaceuticals. The necessity of user perspective.

Authors:  E H Hansen
Journal:  Cah Sociol Demogr Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep

6.  Pharmacovigilance in developing countries.

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed; Kwame N Atuah; Alex N O Dodoo; Peter Winstanley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-08

7.  Pharmacovigilance and new essential drugs in Africa: Zambia draws lessons from its own experiences and beyond.

Authors:  M Huff-Rousselle; O Simooya; V Kabwe; I Hollander; R Handema; A Mwango; E Mwape
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2007

8.  Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A report from the Spanish System of Pharmacovigilance, including an early analysis of topical and enteric-coated formulations.

Authors:  A Figueras; D Capellà; J M Castel; J R Laorte
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Malaria pharmacovigilance in Africa: lessons from a pilot project in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Ushma Mehta; David Durrheim; Aaron Mabuza; Lucille Blumberg; Elizabeth Allen; Karen I Barnes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Pediatric drug surveillance and the Food and Drug Administration's adverse event reporting system: an overview of reports, 2003-2007.

Authors:  Rosemary Johann-Liang; Jo Wyeth; Min Chen; Judith U Cope
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.890

View more
  43 in total

1.  Ongoing challenges in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Gerald J Dal Pan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Methylphenidate and stuttering.

Authors:  Thierry Trenque; Gwladys Claustre; Emmanuelle Herlem; Zoubir Djerada; Agathe Trenque; Aurore Morel; Brahim Azzouz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacovigilance in China: development and challenges.

Authors:  Ying Zhao; Tiansheng Wang; Guangyao Li; Shusen Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-07-26

4.  Serious adverse events reported for antiobesity medicines: postmarketing experiences from the EU adverse event reporting system EudraVigilance.

Authors:  L Aagaard; C E Hallgreen; E H Hansen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Pharmacovigilance in developing countries (part I): importance and challenges.

Authors:  Shaimaa Elshafie; Iman Zaghloul; Anne Marie Roberti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08

6.  First Indian study evaluating role of biochemical investigations and diagnostic tools in detection of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Vishal R Tandon; Vijay Khajuria; Kapila Raina; Vivek Mahajan; Aman Sharma; Zahid Gillani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

7.  Central nervous system-active drug abused and overdose in children: a worldwide exploratory study using the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

Authors:  Carla Carnovale; Faizan Mahzar; Sara Scibelli; Marta Gentili; Elena Arzenton; Ugo Moretti; Olivia Leoni; Marco Pozzi; Gabriëlla G A M Peeters; Emilio Clementi; Massimo Medaglia; Sonia Radice
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Frequent Adverse Drug Reactions, and Medication Groups under Suspicion.

Authors:  Diana Dubrall; Matthias Schmid; Eva Alešik; Norbert Paeschke; Julia Stingl; Bernhardt Sachs
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Descriptive analysis of reported adverse events associated with anti-obesity medications using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) databases 2013-2020.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Alsuhibani; Marwan Alrasheed; Musaab Gari; Ana L Hincapie; Jeff Jianfei Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-09-26

10.  A Retrospective Review of Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow Database from September 2004 to December 2016.

Authors:  Comfort Kunak Ogar; Abiodun Abiola; Daniel Yuah; Ali Ibrahim; Ibrahim Adekunle Oreagba; Emmanuel C Amadi; Mojisola Christianah Adeyeye; Kazeem Adeola Oshikoya
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.