Literature DB >> 23072507

Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment.

Antonio Pierro1, Bertram H Raven, Clara Amato, Jocelyn J Bélanger.   

Abstract

Affective organizational commitment reflects the extent to which organizational members are loyal and willing to work toward organizational objectives (Meyer & Allen, 1997). In particular, affective organizational commitment holds very important implications at all organizational levels (e.g., turnover rates, performance, and citizenship behavior). Whereas previous research has evinced the positive influence of transformational and charismatic leadership styles on affective commitment toward the organization (Bass & Avolio, 1994), little is known with regard to the nature of this relationship. In line with the interpersonal power/interaction model, the present investigation aimed to investigate the mechanism at play between transformational leadership style and affective organizational commitment. Specifically, we hypothesized that transformational leadership style would increase affective organizational commitment through its effect on willingness to comply with soft bases of power. In two studies, we subjected the foregoing hypotheses to empirical scrutiny. In Study 1, the proposed mediation model was empirically supported with Italian employees in the public sector. Attesting to the robustness of our findings, Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1 with Italian employees from the public and private sectors. In addition, Study 2 replicated Study 1 using a different measure of transformational leadership. Both Study 1 and Study 2 provided results consistent with our hypotheses. Specifically, the present paper reports empirical evidence that (1) the more participants report having a transformational leader, the more willing they become to comply with soft (but not harsh) power bases, (2) in turn, greater willingness to comply with soft (but not harsh) power bases increases one's affective organizational commitment. These findings provide additional support for the interpersonal power/interaction model and pave the way for new research directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23072507     DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2012.733398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychol        ISSN: 0020-7594


  4 in total

1.  The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.

Authors:  Katharina Gangl; Eva Hofmann; Barbara Hartl; Mihály Berkics
Journal:  Policy Stud       Date:  2019-02-11

2.  From Perceived Supervisor Social Power to Employee Commitment: Definition and Scale Development.

Authors:  Léandre Alexis Chénard-Poirier; Christian Vandenberghe; Alexandre J S Morin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  The relationship between primary healthcare providers and their external supervisors in Rwanda.

Authors:  Michael Schriver; Vincent K Cubaka; Laetitia Nyirazinyoye; Sylvere Itangishaka; Per Kallestrup
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2017-11-01

4.  The Power of Good: A Leader's Personal Power as a Mediator of the Ethical Leadership-Follower Outcomes Link.

Authors:  Daniela K Haller; Peter Fischer; Dieter Frey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.