Literature DB >> 23071312

Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming.

Andreas Gattinger1, Adrian Muller, Matthias Haeni, Colin Skinner, Andreas Fliessbach, Nina Buchmann, Paul Mäder, Matthias Stolze, Pete Smith, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Urs Niggli.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 ± 0.06% points (mean ± 95% confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 ± 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 ± 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 ± 1.50 Mg C ha(-1)), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 ± 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 ± 0.09% points and 2.16 ± 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 ± 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23071312      PMCID: PMC3497757          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209429109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S G Thompson; S J Sharp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiqi Luo; Dafeng Hui; Deqiang Zhang
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.

Authors:  R Lal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Organic farming and soil carbon sequestration: what do we really know about the benefits?

Authors:  Jens Leifeld; Jürg Fuhrer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 6.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

  6 in total
  36 in total

1.  Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale.

Authors:  David W Crowder; John P Reganold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Organic farming gives no climate change benefit through soil carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Jens Leifeld; Denis A Angers; Claire Chenu; Jürg Fuhrer; Thomas Kätterer; David S Powlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reply to Leifeld et al.: Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming is not equated with climate change mitigation.

Authors:  Andreas Gattinger; Adrian Muller; Matthias Haeni; Colin Skinner; Andreas Fließbach; Nina Buchmann; Paul Mäder; Matthias Stolze; Pete Smith; Nadia El-Hage Scialabba; Urs Niggli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  FORAGES AND PASTURES SYMPOSIUM: COVER CROPS IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION: WHOLE-SYSTEM APPROACH: Managing grazing to restore soil health and farm livelihoods.

Authors:  W R Teague
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Landscape context affects the sustainability of organic farming systems.

Authors:  Olivia M Smith; Abigail L Cohen; John P Reganold; Matthew S Jones; Robert J Orpet; Joseph M Taylor; Jessa H Thurman; Kevin A Cornell; Rachel L Olsson; Yang Ge; Christina M Kennedy; David W Crowder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Application of Bioorganic Fertilizer Significantly Increased Apple Yields and Shaped Bacterial Community Structure in Orchard Soil.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jing Li; Fang Yang; Yaoyao E; Waseem Raza; Qiwei Huang; Qirong Shen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Crop yield gaps in Cameroon.

Authors:  Genesis T Yengoh; Jonas Ardö
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Tightly-Coupled Plant-Soil Nitrogen Cycling: Comparison of Organic Farms across an Agricultural Landscape.

Authors:  Timothy M Bowles; Allan D Hollander; Kerri Steenwerth; Louise E Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean L Tuck; Camilla Winqvist; Flávia Mota; Johan Ahnström; Lindsay A Turnbull; Janne Bengtsson
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.528

10.  Yield and economic performance of organic and conventional cotton-based farming systems--results from a field trial in India.

Authors:  Dionys Forster; Christian Andres; Rajeev Verma; Christine Zundel; Monika M Messmer; Paul Mäder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.