Literature DB >> 23071097

Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments.

Irina M Armean1, Kathryn S Lilley, Matthew W B Trotter.   

Abstract

Advances in sensitivity, resolution, mass accuracy, and throughput have considerably increased the number of protein identifications made via mass spectrometry. Despite these advances, state-of-the-art experimental methods for the study of protein-protein interactions yield more candidate interactions than may be expected biologically owing to biases and limitations in the experimental methodology. In silico methods, which distinguish between true and false interactions, have been developed and applied successfully to reduce the number of false positive results yielded by physical interaction assays. Such methods may be grouped according to: (1) the type of data used: methods based on experiment-specific measurements (e.g., spectral counts or identification scores) versus methods that extract knowledge encoded in external annotations (e.g., public interaction and functional categorisation databases); (2) the type of algorithm applied: the statistical description and estimation of physical protein properties versus predictive supervised machine learning or text-mining algorithms; (3) the type of protein relation evaluated: direct (binary) interaction of two proteins in a cocomplex versus probability of any functional relationship between two proteins (e.g., co-occurrence in a pathway, sub cellular compartment); and (4) initial motivation: elucidation of experimental data by evaluation versus prediction of novel protein-protein interaction, to be experimentally validated a posteriori. This work reviews several popular computational scoring methods and software platforms for protein-protein interactions evaluation according to their methodology, comparative strengths and weaknesses, data representation, accessibility, and availability. The scoring methods and platforms described include: CompPASS, SAINT, Decontaminator, MINT, IntAct, STRING, and FunCoup. References to related work are provided throughout in order to provide a concise but thorough introduction to a rapidly growing interdisciplinary field of investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23071097      PMCID: PMC3536891          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R112.019554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  163 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Marjorie Brand; Jeffrey A Ranish; Nicolas T Kummer; Joan Hamilton; Kazuhiko Igarashi; Claire Francastel; Tian H Chi; Gerald R Crabtree; Ruedi Aebersold; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database.

Authors:  Gary D Bader; Doron Betel; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK).

Authors:  Matthias Selbach; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Comparative evaluation of tandem MS search algorithms using a target-decoy search strategy.

Authors:  Brian M Balgley; Tom Laudeman; Li Yang; Tao Song; Cheng S Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mohan Babu; James Vlasblom; Shuye Pu; Xinghua Guo; Chris Graham; Björn D M Bean; Helen E Burston; Franco J Vizeacoumar; Jamie Snider; Sadhna Phanse; Vincent Fong; Yuen Yi C Tam; Michael Davey; Olha Hnatshak; Navgeet Bajaj; Shamanta Chandran; Thanuja Punna; Constantine Christopolous; Victoria Wong; Analyn Yu; Gouqing Zhong; Joyce Li; Igor Stagljar; Elizabeth Conibear; Shoshana J Wodak; Andrew Emili; Jack F Greenblatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K G Guruharsha; Jean-François Rual; Bo Zhai; Julian Mintseris; Pujita Vaidya; Namita Vaidya; Chapman Beekman; Christina Wong; David Y Rhee; Odise Cenaj; Emily McKillip; Saumini Shah; Mark Stapleton; Kenneth H Wan; Charles Yu; Bayan Parsa; Joseph W Carlson; Xiao Chen; Bhaveen Kapadia; K VijayRaghavan; Steven P Gygi; Susan E Celniker; Robert A Obar; Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Protein interaction sentence detection using multiple semantic kernels.

Authors:  Tamara Polajnar; Theodoros Damoulas; Mark Girolami
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2011-05-14

9.  InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Ostlund; Thomas Schmitt; Kristoffer Forslund; Tina Köstler; David N Messina; Sanjit Roopra; Oliver Frings; Erik L L Sonnhammer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  TiGER: a database for tissue-specific gene expression and regulation.

Authors:  Xiong Liu; Xueping Yu; Donald J Zack; Heng Zhu; Jiang Qian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  14 in total

1.  CHD6 regulates the topological arrangement of the CFTR locus.

Authors:  Ana Sancho; SiDe Li; Thankam Paul; Fan Zhang; Francesca Aguilo; Ajay Vashisht; Natarajan Balasubramaniyan; Neal S Leleiko; Frederick J Suchy; James A Wohlschlegel; Weijia Zhang; Martin J Walsh
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Global landscape of cell envelope protein complexes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mohan Babu; Cedoljub Bundalovic-Torma; Charles Calmettes; Sadhna Phanse; Qingzhou Zhang; Yue Jiang; Zoran Minic; Sunyoung Kim; Jitender Mehla; Alla Gagarinova; Irina Rodionova; Ashwani Kumar; Hongbo Guo; Olga Kagan; Oxana Pogoutse; Hiroyuki Aoki; Viktor Deineko; J Harry Caufield; Erik Holtzapple; Zhongge Zhang; Ake Vastermark; Yogee Pandya; Christine Chieh-Lin Lai; Majida El Bakkouri; Yogesh Hooda; Megha Shah; Dan Burnside; Mohsen Hooshyar; James Vlasblom; Sessandra V Rajagopala; Ashkan Golshani; Stefan Wuchty; Jack F Greenblatt; Milton Saier; Peter Uetz; Trevor F Moraes; John Parkinson; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Protein networks and activation of lymphocytes.

Authors:  Ynes A Helou; Arthur R Salomon
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C β 1b (PI-PLCβ1b) interactome: affinity purification-mass spectrometry analysis of PI-PLCβ1b with nuclear protein.

Authors:  Manuela Piazzi; William L Blalock; Alberto Bavelloni; Irene Faenza; Antonietta D'Angelo; Nadir M Maraldi; Lucio Cocco
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Merging and scoring molecular interactions utilising existing community standards: tools, use-cases and a case study.

Authors:  J M Villaveces; R C Jiménez; P Porras; N Del-Toro; M Duesbury; M Dumousseau; S Orchard; H Choi; P Ping; N C Zong; M Askenazi; B H Habermann; Henning Hermjakob
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Differential connectivity of splicing activators and repressors to the human spliceosome.

Authors:  Martin Akerman; Oliver I Fregoso; Shipra Das; Cristian Ruse; Mads A Jensen; Darryl J Pappin; Michael Q Zhang; Adrian R Krainer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Rapid, optimized interactomic screening.

Authors:  Zhanna Hakhverdyan; Michal Domanski; Loren E Hough; Asha A Oroskar; Anil R Oroskar; Sarah Keegan; David J Dilworth; Kelly R Molloy; Vadim Sherman; John D Aitchison; David Fenyö; Brian T Chait; Torben Heick Jensen; Michael P Rout; John LaCava
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  SILAC-iPAC: a quantitative method for distinguishing genuine from non-specific components of protein complexes by parallel affinity capture.

Authors:  Johanna S Rees; Kathryn S Lilley; Antony P Jackson
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Protein Complex Affinity Capture from Cryomilled Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  John LaCava; Hua Jiang; Michael P Rout
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Proteomics and integrative omic approaches for understanding host-pathogen interactions and infectious diseases.

Authors:  Pierre M Jean Beltran; Joel D Federspiel; Xinlei Sheng; Ileana M Cristea
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.