Literature DB >> 23070940

Structure refinement of protein model decoys requires accurate side-chain placement.

Mark A Olson1, Michael S Lee.   

Abstract

In this study, the application of temperature-based replica-exchange (T-ReX) simulations for structure refinement of decoys taken from the I-TASSER dataset was examined. A set of eight nonredundant proteins was investigated using self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD) with a generalized Born implicit solvent model to sample conformational space. For two of the protein test cases, a comparison of the SGLD/T-ReX method with that of a hybrid explicit/implicit solvent molecular dynamics T-ReX simulation model is provided. Additionally, the effect of side-chain placement among the starting decoy structures, using alternative rotamer conformations taken from the SCWRL4 modeling program, was investigated. The simulation results showed that, despite having near-native backbone conformations among the starting decoys, the determinant of their refinement is side-chain packing to a level that satisfies a minimum threshold of native contacts to allow efficient excursions toward the downhill refinement regime on the energy landscape. By repacking using SCWRL4 and by applying the RWplus statistical potential for structure identification, the SGLD/T-ReX simulations achieved refinement to an average of 38% increase in the number of native contacts relative to the original I-TASSER decoy sets and a 25% reduction in values of C(α) root-mean-square deviation. The hybrid model succeeded in obtaining a sharper funnel to low-energy states for a modeled target than the implicit solvent SGLD model; yet, structure identification remained roughly the same. Without meeting a threshold of near-native packing of side chains, the T-ReX simulations degrade the accuracy of the decoys, and subsequently, refinement becomes tantamount to the protein folding problem. Published 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23070940     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  7 in total

1.  Physics-based method to validate and repair flaws in protein structures.

Authors:  Osvaldo A Martin; Yelena A Arnautova; Alejandro A Icazatti; Harold A Scheraga; Jorge A Vila
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Targeted conformational search with map-restrained self-guided Langevin dynamics: application to flexible fitting into electron microscopic density maps.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Sriram Subramaniam; David A Case; Katherine W Wu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Physics-based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Keenan Noyes; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

4.  Evaluation of unrestrained replica-exchange simulations using dynamic walkers in temperature space for protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Mark A Olson; Michael S Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category.

Authors:  Timothy Nugent; Domenico Cozzetto; David T Jones
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-01-03

6.  On the Helix Propensity in Generalized Born Solvent Descriptions of Modeling the Dark Proteome.

Authors:  Mark A Olson
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  Contact prediction is hardest for the most informative contacts, but improves with the incorporation of contact potentials.

Authors:  Jack Holland; Qinxin Pan; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.