Ximena Gonzalo1, Francis Drobniewski. 1. Health Protection Agency National Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory, 2 Newark Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AT, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To: (i) assess if amoxicillin/clavulanate is a useful option for the management of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB); (ii) assess if meropenem/clavulanate is active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis at concentrations achievable in vivo; and (iii) determine whether there was inhibition of meropenem/clavulanate activity in the presence of amoxicillin. METHODS: Twenty-eight M. tuberculosis strains (7 susceptible, 2 monoresistant, 16 MDR and 3 XDR) were included in the study and tested against different concentrations of meropenem, meropenem/clavulanate, amoxicillin/meropenem, amoxicillin/clavulanate and amoxicillin/meropenem/clavulanate using the Bactec 960 MGIT(®) system. RESULTS: All 28 strains were resistant to meropenem at the highest concentration tested (5 mg/L). Although 24 strains were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, 7 strains were susceptible only to 7.2/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate, 10 strains were susceptible to 3.6/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate, 6 strains were susceptible to 1.8/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate and 1 strain was susceptible to 0.9/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate. Therefore, 4/28 strains (14.29%) were resistant to the highest concentration of amoxicillin tested (7.2 mg/L); all of them were MDR. All of the 11 strains resistant to amoxicillin or susceptible only to 7.2 mg/L amoxicillin increased their susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanate after the addition of meropenem. The addition of clavulanate to meropenem reduced the MIC of meropenem by an average of over 1.8 dilutions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of amoxicillin/clavulanate plus meropenem is active against MDR/XDR-TB in vitro, and this triple therapy could be a useful therapy for MDR/XDR-TB and possibly help to reduce the development of further resistance. The drug susceptibility technique used here is routinely used, with modification, in mycobacteriology laboratories.
OBJECTIVES: To: (i) assess if amoxicillin/clavulanate is a useful option for the management of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB); (ii) assess if meropenem/clavulanate is active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis at concentrations achievable in vivo; and (iii) determine whether there was inhibition of meropenem/clavulanate activity in the presence of amoxicillin. METHODS: Twenty-eight M. tuberculosis strains (7 susceptible, 2 monoresistant, 16 MDR and 3 XDR) were included in the study and tested against different concentrations of meropenem, meropenem/clavulanate, amoxicillin/meropenem, amoxicillin/clavulanate and amoxicillin/meropenem/clavulanate using the Bactec 960 MGIT(®) system. RESULTS: All 28 strains were resistant to meropenem at the highest concentration tested (5 mg/L). Although 24 strains were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, 7 strains were susceptible only to 7.2/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate, 10 strains were susceptible to 3.6/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate, 6 strains were susceptible to 1.8/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate and 1 strain was susceptible to 0.9/2.5 mg/L amoxicillin/clavulanate. Therefore, 4/28 strains (14.29%) were resistant to the highest concentration of amoxicillin tested (7.2 mg/L); all of them were MDR. All of the 11 strains resistant to amoxicillin or susceptible only to 7.2 mg/L amoxicillin increased their susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanate after the addition of meropenem. The addition of clavulanate to meropenem reduced the MIC of meropenem by an average of over 1.8 dilutions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of amoxicillin/clavulanate plus meropenem is active against MDR/XDR-TB in vitro, and this triple therapy could be a useful therapy for MDR/XDR-TB and possibly help to reduce the development of further resistance. The drug susceptibility technique used here is routinely used, with modification, in mycobacteriology laboratories.
Authors: L Davies Forsman; C G Giske; J Bruchfeld; T Schön; P Juréen; K Ängeby Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sander P van Rijn; Shashikant Srivastava; Mireille A Wessels; Dick van Soolingen; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Tawanda Gumbo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Payam Nahid; Sundari R Mase; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Giovanni Sotgiu; Graham H Bothamley; Jan L Brozek; Adithya Cattamanchi; J Peter Cegielski; Lisa Chen; Charles L Daley; Tracy L Dalton; Raquel Duarte; Federica Fregonese; C Robert Horsburgh; Faiz Ahmad Khan; Fayez Kheir; Zhiyi Lan; Alfred Lardizabal; Michael Lauzardo; Joan M Mangan; Suzanne M Marks; Lindsay McKenna; Dick Menzies; Carole D Mitnick; Diana M Nilsen; Farah Parvez; Charles A Peloquin; Ann Raftery; H Simon Schaaf; Neha S Shah; Jeffrey R Starke; John W Wilson; Jonathan M Wortham; Terence Chorba; Barbara Seaworth Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sander P van Rijn; Marlanka A Zuur; Richard Anthony; Bob Wilffert; Richard van Altena; Onno W Akkerman; Wiel C M de Lange; Tjip S van der Werf; Jos G W Kosterink; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.191